2020
DOI: 10.1186/s12916-020-01638-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The cost-effectiveness of controlling dengue in Indonesia using wMel Wolbachia released at scale: a modelling study

Abstract: Background: Release of virus-blocking Wolbachia-infected mosquitoes is an emerging disease control strategy that aims to control dengue and other arboviral infections. Early entomological data and modelling analyses have suggested promising outcomes, and wMel Wolbachia releases are now ongoing or planned in 12 countries. To help inform government, donor, or philanthropist decisions on scale-up beyond single city releases, we assessed this technology's cost-effectiveness under alternative programmatic options. … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(74 reference statements)
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 30 An attractive aspect of this strategy is that it maintains itself in the mosquito population and does not need re-application. 31 Future trials should explore the multivalency of the intervention, since laboratory studies 12 , 32 35 suggest w Mel should also attenuate transmission of Zika, chikungunya, Yellow Fever and Mayaro viruses by Ae. aegypti .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 30 An attractive aspect of this strategy is that it maintains itself in the mosquito population and does not need re-application. 31 Future trials should explore the multivalency of the intervention, since laboratory studies 12 , 32 35 suggest w Mel should also attenuate transmission of Zika, chikungunya, Yellow Fever and Mayaro viruses by Ae. aegypti .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, costs are far higher compared to the currently available estimate of $1500 per DALYs averted under the replacement programme in Yogyakarta [14]. There are several competing factors driving the disparities in the cost-effectiveness of the Wolbachia programme: (1) labour and equipment costs in Singapore are far higher than Indonesia, (2) the replacement approach includes a large number of one off costs mostly related to releases that occur in the initial year of intervention, whereas the suppression approach relies on the assumption that constant release is necessary to maintain low wild-type mosquito populations, (3) our estimates of Wolbachia effectiveness, and by extension its cost-effectiveness come from field data/trials rather than model-based extrapolations of effectiveness based on laboratory data (4) Singapore presents an overall different epidemiological situation, with a drastically higher population density at 7,810 persons per square kilometre [61] compared to urban areas included in [14]. In comparison, the densest release area was the Jakarta metropolitan area [14] with only 4,383 persons per square kilometre in 2021.…”
Section: Plos Global Public Healthmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…China [11], the USA [12] and Singapore [13] have suppression-based programmes, which have been implemented due to its perceived compatibility with existing vector control programmes, and greater social acceptability compared to the former approach. A previous study in Yogyarkata, Indonesia has since explored the cost-effectiveness of introgression programmes, taking into account spatio-temporal heterogeneity of the impact of Wolbachia through a modelling approach [14]. However, to the best of the authors' knowledge, the cost-effectiveness of suppression-based programmes is not yet known.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an additional scenario analysis, we also use a cost per person covered of $15.05 (the mean of the accelerated costs in Brady et al [ 78 ]) adjusted to 2013 prices (for consistency). This is the average of the cost per person for an accelerated Wolbachia programme ranging from approximately $12 to $21 per person.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%