2019
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1269/1/012014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The cosmological constant effect on the quantum entanglement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is due to the fact that the gravitational potential g 00 decreases as J (or ρ) increases and thus information (or concurrence) increases until a saturated bound of the maximal entanglement ( C( f ) ∼ 1). Figure 2 shows the concurrence variation as a function of q for fixed values of α = 2, z and Σ, at smaller value of q (q → 0), the entangled is max and if q the center of the wave packet travels more on the circular trajectory and therefore one has more decoherence (less entanglement ) and consequently the concurrence decreases for example if q = 1 ,C( f ) = 0.7 and if q = 1.6 C( f ) = 0.4, the oscillator periodic behavior can be explained (as it was pointed out in ref [2].) by the fact that when q increases, the exponential in the integral that present in the expression of the concurrence approaches unity, so the cosine and sine terms behavior dominates.…”
Section: Mathematical Formalismmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This is due to the fact that the gravitational potential g 00 decreases as J (or ρ) increases and thus information (or concurrence) increases until a saturated bound of the maximal entanglement ( C( f ) ∼ 1). Figure 2 shows the concurrence variation as a function of q for fixed values of α = 2, z and Σ, at smaller value of q (q → 0), the entangled is max and if q the center of the wave packet travels more on the circular trajectory and therefore one has more decoherence (less entanglement ) and consequently the concurrence decreases for example if q = 1 ,C( f ) = 0.7 and if q = 1.6 C( f ) = 0.4, the oscillator periodic behavior can be explained (as it was pointed out in ref [2].) by the fact that when q increases, the exponential in the integral that present in the expression of the concurrence approaches unity, so the cosine and sine terms behavior dominates.…”
Section: Mathematical Formalismmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…1) If Q 2 1 (in arbitrary unit) the term DQ 4 dominates, since D 0, then if η 2 increases the GF decreases leading to an increases in E( ) (as it is the case of Figure 8) 2) If Q 2 1, then the term F dominates and its sign will determine the behavior of E( ) as a function of η 2 , if F 0, then GF increases and E( ) decreases, we return to case in the Figure 7. Figure 9 represents the variation of E( ) as function of z for fixed Q = 0, η = 0, α = 1, q = 0.01, (case of Schwarzschild space-time in commutative space-time).…”
Section: Reissner-nordström Noncommutative Space-timementioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The motion has a radius with constant speed . After obtaining a central force motion, the components of the centroid 4-momentum in the local inertial frame are given by [ 12 ] Where is the Lorentz factor.…”
Section: Mathematical Formalismmentioning
confidence: 99%