1996
DOI: 10.1007/bf00146349
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The cosmic-ray 1.68-year variation: A clue to understand the nature of the solar cycle?

Abstract: Using the maximum entropy method (MEM), the cosmic-ray power spectral density in the frequency range 3 x 10-9-2 • 10-Hz has been estimated for the period 1947-1990. Cosmic-ray intensity data were integrated from the ion chamber at Huancayo and the neutron monitor at Deep River, following the method of Nagashima and Morishita (1980). The estimated spectrum shows power-law dependence (f-1.62), with several peaks superimposed. Periodicities of the different peaks are identified and related to solar activity pheno… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
35
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
10
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The last ones are consistent with the fact that the short time periods have a different probability of occurrence in different epochs (Xanthakis et al, 1989). Valdes-Galicia, Perez-Enriquez and Otaola (1996) and Valdes-Galicia and Mendoza (1998) have reported on a short-time variation of 1.68 year in the cosmicray intensity observed at the Earth at neutron monitor energies (several GeV). They proposed that this cosmic-ray variation might appear as a consequence of phenomena rooted in the solar interior and could help in understanding the origin of the solar magnetic cycle.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The last ones are consistent with the fact that the short time periods have a different probability of occurrence in different epochs (Xanthakis et al, 1989). Valdes-Galicia, Perez-Enriquez and Otaola (1996) and Valdes-Galicia and Mendoza (1998) have reported on a short-time variation of 1.68 year in the cosmicray intensity observed at the Earth at neutron monitor energies (several GeV). They proposed that this cosmic-ray variation might appear as a consequence of phenomena rooted in the solar interior and could help in understanding the origin of the solar magnetic cycle.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The peak of 5.1 months is present in all cycles with a strong appearance in cycle 21. Valdes-Galicia et al (1996) and Mavromichalaki et al (2002) have already reported that the cosmic ray fluctuation of 5.1 m has appeared in cosmic-ray intensity at the maximum phase only of cycle 21 and not of cycle 20, while for earlier (and later) cycles and periods the evidence is contradictory. The evidence for this periodicity (154 days) in flare-related data is convincing for the interval 1978-1983 of the cycle 21.…”
Section: Power Spectrummentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A strong oscillation in GCR fluxes of period T =1.68 yr (frequency, f =0.595 yr −1 =9 nHz) has been reported recently and related to similar oscillations in solar surface features (Valdés-Galicia et al, 1996;Valdés-Galicia and Mendoza, 1998). This periodicity has also been found in the coronal hole area (McIntosh et al, 1992;Maravilla et al, 2001).…”
Section: The Imprint Of the Open Solar Flux In Gcr Fluxessupporting
confidence: 71%
“…It was eported first by (Valdés-Galicia et al, 1996), analyzed by wavelet technique by (Kudela et al, 2002), found also in the outer heliosphere in Voyager data (Kato et al, 2003). Earlier, using NM data Calgary and Deep River, (Kudela et al, 1991) indicated that around ~20 month the change of the shape of PSD occurs.…”
Section: Periodic and Quasi-periodic Variationsmentioning
confidence: 99%