2019
DOI: 10.3233/jifs-181922
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The cosine similarity measures of spherical fuzzy sets and their applications in decision making

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
82
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
82
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, which is different from the results of the method proposed here, both in overall ranking and in best choice. Furthermore, from the Spearman's rank-correlation test, it can be inferred that the rankings produced by the methods in [32,36] are similar to that produced by the proposed method, and the ranking using methods [37,45] are uncorrelated with the ranking based on the proposed method.…”
Section: Ranking Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…, which is different from the results of the method proposed here, both in overall ranking and in best choice. Furthermore, from the Spearman's rank-correlation test, it can be inferred that the rankings produced by the methods in [32,36] are similar to that produced by the proposed method, and the ranking using methods [37,45] are uncorrelated with the ranking based on the proposed method.…”
Section: Ranking Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed method (P1) 5 4 2 1 6 3 The method using Archimedean operator by [32] (P2) 5 4 3 1 6 2 The method using logarithmic operation by [36] (P3) 5 3 2 1 6 4 The method using cosine similarity measures by [37] (P4) 3 2 4 1 5 6 The method using induced generalized aggregation operator by [45] Specifically, the method based on Archimedean operators proposed by Ashraf et al [23] is applied in this numerical example. The result of an alternative ranking is…”
Section: Ranking Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations