2019
DOI: 10.3390/app9030488
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Correlation between Users’ Cognitive Characteristics and Visualization Literacy

Abstract: One of the ultimate goals of studies on visualization literacy is to improve users’ visualization literacy through education and training. Even though users’ cognitive characteristics may significantly affect learning and responding processes in general, studies have addressed the relationships between users’ cognitive characteristics and visualization literacy. As a first step toward discovering the relationships, we conducted an empirical study to investigate the correlation between cognitive characteristics… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
(118 reference statements)
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The research by Lee et al 28 aims to find the connection between visual literacy and the following three cognitive characteristics: numeracy as cognitive ability, cognitive motivation and cognitive style. An experiment with 178 participants using MTurk is conducted.…”
Section: The State-of-the-art On Interactive Visualization Literacymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The research by Lee et al 28 aims to find the connection between visual literacy and the following three cognitive characteristics: numeracy as cognitive ability, cognitive motivation and cognitive style. An experiment with 178 participants using MTurk is conducted.…”
Section: The State-of-the-art On Interactive Visualization Literacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Baker et al 34 R + W A 52 Delmas et al 35 R A 1464 Scho ¨nborn et al 36 R A + C N/A Grammel et al 25 R + W A 4, 9 Kodagoda et al 26 R A 24 Boy et al 4 R A 34, 37, 34, 39 Huron et al 37 R + W A 12 Ruchikarhorn and Mueller 38 R A 22, 11,11 Maltese et al 39 R A 202 Kwon and Lee 40 R + W A 120 Bo ¨rner et al 5 R A + C 273 Alper et al 41 R + W C 6, 15 Lee et al 6 R A 65, 191 Wojton et al 42 R A 388 Chevalier et al 1 R + W C N/A Zoss et al 43 R + W A+ C N/A Mansoor and Harrison 44 R A + C N/A Bo ¨rner et al 45 R + W A+ C N/A Stoiber et al 46 R A + C N/A Lee et al 28 R A 178 Fuchs et al 47 R A 28 Ga ¨bler et al 48 R C 23 Bishop et al 27 R C 24 Lalle ´et al 49 R A 119 Krekhov et al 50 R + W A 11 Firat et al 22 R A 25 Wang et al 51 R + W A 11 Rodrigues et al 52 R A 22 Huynh et al 53 R C 33 D'Ignazio and Bhargava 54 R + W A + C N/A Donohoe and Costello 55 R A 32 Barral et al 56 R A 56, 119 Barral et al 57 R A 56, 119 Peppler et al 58 R The first in the wild concentrates on the process of collaborating with community groups, Groundwork Somerville, and local youth design to paint a datadriven story as a community mural. This example of a ''data mural'' documents an action-oriented, community-based project that builds data literacy.…”
Section: Number Of Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With average SUS score of 84.8%, the experts' rating demonstrates and validates the effectiveness of the design in visualizing OBE predictive assessment. The inclusion of visualization literacy into the design consideration greatly affects the perceived effectiveness of presented visualization to the users [28]. Despite the positive results, the implemented design only employs basic visualization that can be limited when visualizing advanced or complex analysis scenario.…”
Section: B Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results from prior studies with children (see section 2.3) guide us to expect that children will have larger errors than adults on graphical perception tasks. We believe this because children's proportional reasoning skills are still maturing [8,46], their graphical perception skill is tied to numerous other cognitive abilities that may mature with more schooling [42], and they use different and sometimes less effective strategies than adults [36]. Our best indicator of a difference between children and adults is the work done by Spence & Krizel [65,66], which found consistently larger errors for children on proportional reasoning tasks.…”
Section: Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%