2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.04.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The correlation between metabolic and individual leg mechanical power during walking at different slopes and velocities

Abstract: During level-ground walking, mechanical work from each leg is required to redirect and accelerate the center of mass. Previous studies show a linear correlation between net metabolic power and the rate of step-to-step transition work during level-ground walking with changing step lengths. However, correlations between metabolic power and individual leg power during step-to-step transitions while walking on uphill/downhill slopes and at different velocities are not known. This basic understanding of these relat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Functionally, a longer T4 indicates that the COM is still rising when its forward velocity starts to increase (Figs 1 , 2 & 3 ). Walking uphill on steeper slopes involves a greater during double support and this positive work is done both by the leading and the trailing legs [ 43 , 44 ]. Our results show that, a significant part of the positive external work performed during the step is generated during T4 and T1 and that this work increases when speed increases ( Fig 10 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Functionally, a longer T4 indicates that the COM is still rising when its forward velocity starts to increase (Figs 1 , 2 & 3 ). Walking uphill on steeper slopes involves a greater during double support and this positive work is done both by the leading and the trailing legs [ 43 , 44 ]. Our results show that, a significant part of the positive external work performed during the step is generated during T4 and T1 and that this work increases when speed increases ( Fig 10 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We iteratively tuned the BiOM prosthesis to match the average biological ankle sagittal plane range of motion, peak moment, peak power, and net work from 20 non-amputees at each slope (Jeffers et al, 2015). Though subjects used the same tuning parameters, prosthetic components, and alignment established in the tuning sessions for all experimental sessions, they likely modified the way that they walked while using the BiOM during the final experimental session compared to the tuning sessions (Figure 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To objectively tune the BiOM, we calculated prosthetic ankle angles, moments, powers, and net mechanical work normalized to body mass, including prosthetic mass using Visual 3D software (C-Motion, Germantown, MD, USA) after each 45-s trial and compared these data with averages from 20 non-amputees walking at the same speed and slopes (Jeffers et al, 2015). Similar to Ventura et al (2011), we did not adjust the rigid segment model foot or shank in Visual 3D and used inertial properties inherent in the Visual 3D anatomical model due to the similar weight of the BiOM and an anatomical foot and shank (21.6 N).…”
Section: Tuning Of the Powered Prosthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To objectively tune the powered prosthesis at each slope, we calculated prosthetic ankle angles, moments, powers and work normalized to subject mass with the prosthesis during each 45 s trial using Visual 3D (C-Motion, Germantown, MD, USA) and compared these data with averages from 20 non-amputees walking at the same speed and slope on the same equipment [21]. We then iteratively tuned the powered prosthesis for each slope using a tablet with software provided by the manufacturer (BionX Medical Technologies).…”
Section: Subject Recruitmentmentioning
confidence: 99%