2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0370-2693(00)00544-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The correction to BR[B→Xsγ]

Abstract: We evaluate the O( αem αs ) correction to the rate of B → X s γ decay, i.e. we resum all the.. . Our calculation differs from the previously available one by that it takes into account the complete relevant set of operators. The correction is found to be negligible, i.e. it is below 1%, in accordance with the former results. ⋆ This paper is based on the M.Sc. thesis of the first author.At present, the next-to-leading logarithmic QCD analysis of B → X s γ decay allows predicting its branching ratio with around … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
48
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
4
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At NNLL QCD accuracy subdominant perturbative electroweak two-loop corrections are also relevant and have been calculated to be −3.6% (74,75,76,77). They are included in the present NNLL prediction.…”
Section: Tobias Hurth and Mikihiko Nakaomentioning
confidence: 88%
“…At NNLL QCD accuracy subdominant perturbative electroweak two-loop corrections are also relevant and have been calculated to be −3.6% (74,75,76,77). They are included in the present NNLL prediction.…”
Section: Tobias Hurth and Mikihiko Nakaomentioning
confidence: 88%
“…As far as the perturbative corrections are concerned, they are reduced dramatically after the completion of Next-to-Leading-Order (NLO) and NNLO QCD calculations. A further improvement comes from electroweak corrections [66][67][68][69]. On the other hand, no satisfactory quantitative estimates of all the non-perturbative effects are available, but they are believed to be ≈ 5% [70].…”
Section: Constraints On the 4g2hdmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…accounts for electroweak matching corrections at the weak scale [30] and logarithmically enhanced electromagnetic effects affecting the evolution of the Wilson coefficients [17,31]. Finally, the term ε peng ≈ 0.2% includes the effects of penguin contractions of operators other than Q c,u 1 [27], which are numerically negligible but are included here for completeness.…”
Section: Qcd Factorization Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%