2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0042-207x(02)00173-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The correct and incorrect generation of a cosine distribution of scattered particles for Monte-Carlo modelling of vacuum systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
58
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We shifted the distribution in velocity space by the spacecraft velocity vector, and scaled it by velocity, i.e., f (υ) → υf (υ) such that particles are initialized according to the arrival rate at the aperture (Greenwood 2002). By contrast we subdivided the vent aperture into 20 flat sub-planes to approximate its curved surface, evaluating the number of molecules and the velocity vector distributions for each individual plane according to the portion υf (υ) within the velocity space hemisphere seen by that plane.…”
Section: Appendix F: Monte Carlo Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We shifted the distribution in velocity space by the spacecraft velocity vector, and scaled it by velocity, i.e., f (υ) → υf (υ) such that particles are initialized according to the arrival rate at the aperture (Greenwood 2002). By contrast we subdivided the vent aperture into 20 flat sub-planes to approximate its curved surface, evaluating the number of molecules and the velocity vector distributions for each individual plane according to the portion υf (υ) within the velocity space hemisphere seen by that plane.…”
Section: Appendix F: Monte Carlo Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, the scattered atom has an energy that depends on the charge of the impinging ion, the plasma potential, the wall material, and other factors; at this moment we neglect all these effects and randomly pick the energy from a Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution with a temperature of 1 eV. The angular distribution of the neutralized particle is assumed to be given by a cosine law [13]. When the neutralized fast atom hits the wall again it loses part of its energy.…”
Section: Code Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the implementation of the formula can sometimes be cumbersome and susceptible to mistakes [22]. Additionally, the cosine law is not easily includable into the finite difference method in this form, but an alternative representation of this law presented below will allow for such an integration.…”
Section: Theory For Modeling Knudsen Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%