A renewal of historical interest in the politics and religion of the Restoration began in the late 1980s and has changed how we look at the period. This article seeks to explain the origins of the recent wave of Restoration scholarship, provides an overview of the field, and offers suggestions about critical interpretive issues. The article adopts a British approach, seeking to find common patterns in the reigns of Charles II and James II in Scotland, Ireland, and England. It traces the instability of the Restoration settlements to their coercive treatment of Protestant dissenters, and it offers suggestions for developing a three‐kingdom framework for the treatment of Protestant divisions from the 1640s through the Glorious Revolution. It endorses the proposal that the crisis of 1679–81 was a multi‐faceted Restoration Crisis, rather than an exclusion crisis; and it suggests also that, in England, the competition of Whigs and Tories marked a turning point in the development of more modern structures for political debate and discussion. It examines the question of whether Charles and James turned towards absolutism thereafter in the broader context of the emerging state. In conclusion, the article considers the Restoration as a transitional era between the ‘long Reformation’ and the ‘long eighteenth century’.