2003
DOI: 10.1080/0267257x.2003.9728239
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Corporate Identity Management Process Revisited

Abstract: This paper has two objectives. It attempts firstly to define a number ofrelated concepts in the corporate identity management process and secondly, to update one of the earlier models of this process. Recent developments in the corporate identity management theory are discussed and models of this process are reviewed.An up-to-date model of the corporate identity management process is proposed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
53
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
53
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Even though the CSR and corporate identity concepts have been much debated, little attention has been given to the relation between the formulated ideals and the enacted practices (Morsing and Schultz, 2006). In addition to this, there is a paucity of empirical research that examines organizations' actions to manage corporate identity and CSR (Bick et al, 2003;Cornelissen and Harris, 2001).…”
Section: The Dynamics Of Collective Identifi Cationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Even though the CSR and corporate identity concepts have been much debated, little attention has been given to the relation between the formulated ideals and the enacted practices (Morsing and Schultz, 2006). In addition to this, there is a paucity of empirical research that examines organizations' actions to manage corporate identity and CSR (Bick et al, 2003;Cornelissen and Harris, 2001).…”
Section: The Dynamics Of Collective Identifi Cationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I N THE LAST 20 YEARS AN INCREASING NUMBER OF RESEARCHERS HAS PAID ATTENTION TO CORPORATE IDENTITY management as a source of competitive advantage (Bick et al, 2003), and corporate social responsibility (CSR) policies have often been introduced to create shared organizational values in the making of a general organizational identity. This has been done because CSR initiatives are likely to evoke strong and often positive reactions among employees, costumers and other external stakeholders (Morsing and Schultz, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The corporate identity literature has long noted the importance of corporate identity management and the important role of senior managers (Balmer 1998(Balmer , 2009aBick et al 2003;Bartholmé & Melewar, 2009. Recently, marketing scholars have stressed the importance of management cognitions and self-understanding for corporate identity management and implementation (He & Balmer, 2007, 2013He, 2012).…”
Section: The Management Of Corporate Heritage and Corporate Heritage mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An unabated interest in corporate identities has characterized the corporate marketing domain since the mid-1990s (see for example Balmer, 1998Balmer, , 2001Balmer, , 2008Balmer, , 2011cMelewar & Saunders, 2000;Melewar, 2003;Bick, Jacobson & Abratt, 2003;Suvatjis & de Chernatony, 2005;Melewar, Karaosmanoglu & Paterson, 2005;Melewar, & Karaosmanoglu, 2006;Powell, 2011;Leitch & Davenport, 2011;Abratt & Kleyn, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, Post and Griffin (1997) viewed corporate reputation as a "synthesis of the opinions, perceptions and attitudes of an organization's stakeholders" (p.156). To Bick et al (2003) corporate reputation represents "the general view of the company" (p. 853) "the external stakeholders' perception about an organization" (Davis & Miles, 1998;Hatchel & Schulz, 2000), "a reflection of stakeholders' views about an organization overtime" (Saxton, 1998), the "lasting perception held of an organization by an individual group or network that forms a collective system of beliefs and opinions that influence people's actions with regard to an organization" (Banter, 2000), "an overall evaluation of the extent to which a firm is substantially 'good' or 'bad'" (Keh&Yie, 2009).…”
Section: Concept Of Corporate Reputationmentioning
confidence: 99%