The Core-Periphery Concept and Population Growth in South Africa, 1911–1960

Fair, T. J. D.

doi:10.1080/03736245.1965.10559402

Cited by 14 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The successive rise and decline of prestigious neighbourhoods in Johannesburg is illustrated in Figures 2 and 3. In Figure 2 tained in Perloff (1963) and Fair (1965). The four radial transects of Figure 3 complement the shift analysis by demonstrating in detail changes in the elite population of residential areas at various distances from the centre of the city.…”

Section: Source Of Data and Research Proceduresmentioning

confidence: 91%

The Evolving Pattern of Élite White Residential Areas in Johannesburg, 1911–1970

Hart

1976

South African Geographical Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Research into the spatial evolution of elite residential areas in Melbourne has produced results that both support and cont~a~ict longitudinal aspects of the we\1-known Hoyt sector model. A SImIlar st~dy of elite White residential areas in Johannesburg confirms the Australian finding that, although the Hoyt model correctly predict~ a sectoral spatial expansion of high socio-economic status areas, it falls to account for intra-sector spatial variation where the highest status levels are characteristic of residential enclaves relatively close to the city centre.

show abstract

Section: Source Of Data and Research Proceduresmentioning

confidence: 91%

The Evolving Pattern of Élite White Residential Areas in Johannesburg, 1911–1970

Hart

1976

South African Geographical Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The spatial patterns of regional inequality in South Africa have been studied extensively over the past half century or more, and several regional demarcations have been undertaken on the basis of the core-periphery model and the model of development (Fair 1965(Fair , 1970(Fair , 1974(Fair , 1976Board et al 1970;Schmidt 1973;Browett and Fair 1974;Browett 1975Browett , 1976Hanekom 1976;Olivier 1981;Bloch 2000;Harmse 1989Harmse , 2004Harmse , 2007. The methodology and model of development regions used for the 1980, 1991 and 1996 regional demarcations (Harmse 1989(Harmse , 2004(Harmse , 2007 were used to facilitate the demarcation of development regions for 2001.…”

Section: A Spatial Analysis Of Day Labourers General Levels Of Develomentioning

confidence: 99%