1982
DOI: 10.1177/016555158200400506
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The cooked and the raw

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Davenport and Prusak (1998) define data as a set of discrete, objective facts about events, Spiegler's (2000) definition of data echoes this view. Hammarberg (1981) discusses similar views, arguing that they are based on a foundationalist thesis that there exist raw, objective records of facts. He shows that this thesis fails.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, Davenport and Prusak (1998) define data as a set of discrete, objective facts about events, Spiegler's (2000) definition of data echoes this view. Hammarberg (1981) discusses similar views, arguing that they are based on a foundationalist thesis that there exist raw, objective records of facts. He shows that this thesis fails.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He shows that this thesis fails. One reason is that we must always express data in a representational language of some kind, which provides the categories in terms of which we view the reality, implying that data are also "cooked" (cf Hammarberg, 1981). Tuomi (1999) points out that the generally accepted view in the KM community sees a hierarchy of data, information, and knowledge in which data are a prerequisite for information, and information is a prerequisite for knowledge (cf also Spiegler, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%