2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.dam.2017.11.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The convexity of induced paths of order three and applications: Complexity aspects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is important to emphasize that there are several similar functions defined over the vertices of a graph in the literature, leading to several graph convexities, e.g. : geodetic [5], P 3 [6], P * 3 [7], monophonic [8]. The graph convexities we should emphasize are the P 3 and P * 3 .…”
Section: Graph Convexitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is important to emphasize that there are several similar functions defined over the vertices of a graph in the literature, leading to several graph convexities, e.g. : geodetic [5], P 3 [6], P * 3 [7], monophonic [8]. The graph convexities we should emphasize are the P 3 and P * 3 .…”
Section: Graph Convexitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the authors prove that computing the hull number is NP-complete in general, and they give polynomial results for chordal graphs and cographs. In [7], the authors prove that computing the hull number in the P 3 -convexity remains NP-hard even when restricted to subgraphs of the grid. It implies that it is NP-hard for bipartite planar graphs with bounded maximum degree.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The classical convexity invariants Carathéodory, Helly, and Radon numbers have already been determined for the triangle path [5] and the monophonic [12,18] All these six problems have already been considered in the geodetic [1,8,14,16], monophonic [7,10], and P 3 [4,2] convexities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All these six problems have already been considered in the geodetic [1,8,14,16], monophonic [7,10], and P 3 [4,2] convexities.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Morris [29] and Riedl [32] studied the maximum size of minimal percolating sets on the square grid [n] 2 and the hypercube {0, 1} d , respectively, answering a question posed by Bollobás. However, the problem of finding the smallest percolating set is NP-hard even on subgraphs of the square grid [2] and it is APX-hard even for bipartite graphs with maximum degree four [18]. Moreover, it is hard [17] to approximate within a ratio O(2 log 1−ε n ), for any ε > 0, unless N P ⊆ DT IM E(n polylog(n) ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%