2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-70464-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The conversion of forestland into agricultural land without appropriate measures to conserve SOM leads to the degradation of physical and rheological soil properties

Abstract: This study was conducted to compare soil particle density (ρ s), soil total porosity (TP), liquid limit (LL), plastic limit (PL), and plasticity index, and their relations with soil organic matter (SOM), of non-carbonate silty clay Fluvisols under different land uses. Three neighboring land uses were studied: native deciduous forest, arable land, and meadow, managed in the same way for more than 100 years. Soil was collected from 27 soil profiles and from three depths (0-15, 15-30 and 30-45 cm). Land use cause… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The values of soil organic matter content belong to the main factors influencing bulk density (e.g., Duffková, Kvítek 2009;Ruehlmann, Körschens 2009;Tolimir et al 2020) and other physical soil properties (Huntington 2007); the decrease of soil organic matter content led to the higher values of bulk density (e.g., Sakin et al 2011). The values of bulk density also depend on the texture, mineral constituents and porosity (Baver et al 1972;Vopravil et al 2017b); correlations of bulk density with total porosity were reported by Hemmat et al (2010) etc.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The values of soil organic matter content belong to the main factors influencing bulk density (e.g., Duffková, Kvítek 2009;Ruehlmann, Körschens 2009;Tolimir et al 2020) and other physical soil properties (Huntington 2007); the decrease of soil organic matter content led to the higher values of bulk density (e.g., Sakin et al 2011). The values of bulk density also depend on the texture, mineral constituents and porosity (Baver et al 1972;Vopravil et al 2017b); correlations of bulk density with total porosity were reported by Hemmat et al (2010) etc.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sites with a fast rate of recovery, namely post‐mining sites especially where grading and topsoil application is avoided (Cejpek et al, 2013; Frouz et al, 2018) as well as post‐fire succession, which were mostly forest sites, are characterized by high macroporosity (low compaction). On the other hand, arable land and meadows have lower porosity than forests and often suffer from larger soil compaction due to agricultural machinery movement (Gajić et al, 2008; Tolimir et al, 2020). Also, other post‐industrial sites are often compacted due to the moving of various types of earth moving machinery (Burger et al, 2020; Minea & Secu, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thirty years after afforestation with Eucalyptus, SOM stocks recovered to nearly 70% of the SOM stocks determined in the natural forest [5]. The loss of SOM also affects other chemical and physical properties of soils, such as soil particle density and soil porosity [13], as well as aggregate stability and soil quality [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%