The Handbook of Conversation Analysis 2012
DOI: 10.1002/9781118325001.ch4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Conversation Analytic Approach to Transcription

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
202
0
11

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 329 publications
(232 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
202
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…The interviews were recorded on a dictaphone and transcribed using a simplified version of the scheme developed by Gail Jefferson Jefferson's transcription conveyed various features of the delivery of talk to capture the subtlety of their delivery (Hepburn & Bolden, 2013) in order to discover and describe orderly practices of talk-in-interaction, allowing interaction features to be appreciated (Potter & Hepburn, 2005) (see Appendix for transcription notation).…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interviews were recorded on a dictaphone and transcribed using a simplified version of the scheme developed by Gail Jefferson Jefferson's transcription conveyed various features of the delivery of talk to capture the subtlety of their delivery (Hepburn & Bolden, 2013) in order to discover and describe orderly practices of talk-in-interaction, allowing interaction features to be appreciated (Potter & Hepburn, 2005) (see Appendix for transcription notation).…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All data were subject to multiple hearings to transcription; transcription itself was then executed using full Jeffersonian conventions (see Hepburn and Bolden, 2013, and Box 1). Analysis proceeded in line with the systematic principles outlined in exacting detail by Wiggins (2017), regarding how conversational data should be interpreted within the DP tradition.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first concerns the method of timing. Rather than measure the duration of gaps and pauses objectively (e.g., using a computer), conversation analysts typically employ a relative method of timing, one that reflects the analyst's perception of time (Hepburn and Bolden, 2013), a method that has been shown to overestimate objectively measured time systematically (Roberts and Robinson, 2004;. The second issue is the lack of an explicit comparison between the timing of OIRs and the timing of other turns in the same conversations.…”
Section: The Timing Of Other-initiationsmentioning
confidence: 99%