2019
DOI: 10.3847/1538-3881/ab2d28
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Convective Electric Field Influence on the Cold Plasma and Diamagnetic Cavity of Comet 67P

Abstract: We studied the distribution of cold electrons (<1 eV) around comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko with respect to the solar wind convective electric field direction. The cold plasma was measured by the Langmuir Probe instrument and the direction of the convective electric field E conv =−v×B was determined from magnetic field (B) measurements inside the coma combined with an assumption of a purely radial solar wind velocity v. We found that the cold plasma is twice as likely to be observed when the convective el… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
3
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The physics of the region is still under debate but Odelstad et al (2018) showed that cold electrons were almost always observed in large amounts inside the diamagnetic cavity. Edberg et al (2019) found that the observations of cold electrons in the diamagnetic cavity were organized by the direction of the solar wind convective electric field. More cold electrons were observed in the −E conv hemisphere that was the main direction inside the diamagnetic cavity.…”
Section: Observations Of Cold Cometary Electrons Inside Diamagnetic Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The physics of the region is still under debate but Odelstad et al (2018) showed that cold electrons were almost always observed in large amounts inside the diamagnetic cavity. Edberg et al (2019) found that the observations of cold electrons in the diamagnetic cavity were organized by the direction of the solar wind convective electric field. More cold electrons were observed in the −E conv hemisphere that was the main direction inside the diamagnetic cavity.…”
Section: Observations Of Cold Cometary Electrons Inside Diamagnetic Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fifth panel: Rosetta latitude (green line) expressed in degrees and the heliocentric distance (yellow line). Edberg et al 2019). The cold electrons observed by RPC-MIP inside the diamagnetic cavity are discussed in Sect.…”
Section: Overview Of the Detection And The Location Of Cold Cometary mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To convert the positions from the CSEQ frame into the CSE frame, we used the average local magnetic field outside the cavity in each cavity crossing. No solar wind ions were recorded locally because Rosetta was inside the SWIC (Behar et al 2017), but because the clock angle of the magnetic field in the upstream solar wind tended to remain the same in the inner coma (Edberg et al 2019), we can assume a general anti-sunward motion of the magnetic field (bulk plasma) and thus the motional electric field would point upward (+Z CSE ). Nevertheless, we do not see any asymmetry in the spatial distribution of the accelerated ions in either of the two coordinate systems.…”
Section: Subperiod P1 P2 P3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this comparison, the solar wind direction is simply assumed as the direction away from the Sun. This has been shown to be a good estimator for the CSE system (Edberg et al, 2019). The local solar wind velocity at this stage in the cometary development is not representative of the upstream solar wind direction, because of deflection (Nilsson et al, 2017).…”
Section: Location Of the Eventsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regime the cometary ions are accelerated by the convective electric field far upstream of the comet and a polarisation and ambipolar electric field closer to the nucleus (Nilsson et al, 2018;Gunell et al, 2019). The presence of the convective electric field induces an asymmetry in the interaction region that has consequences for all plasma parameters (Koenders et al, 2016a, b;Edberg et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%