2001
DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2001.tb00090.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Controversy Over Score Banding in Personnel Selection: Answers to 10 Key Questions

Abstract: A particular form of test score banding, in which bands are based on the reliability of the test and in which selection within bands takes into account criteria that are likely to enhance workforce diversity, has been proposed as an alternative to the traditional top‐down (rank‐order) hiring systems, but it has been hotly debated among both scientists and practitioners. In a question‐and‐answer format, this article presents three different viewpoints (proponents, critics, and neutral observers) on the scientif… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
56
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(50 reference statements)
0
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…accepted solution (although still not free of controversy) in industrial/organizational psychology is known as score banding, in which scores within a certain range are treated as equivalent (see Campion et al, 2001), with the goal of more representative hiring or promotion decisions. However, if scalar invariance holds, but metric invariance does not, the construct factor itself is different.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…accepted solution (although still not free of controversy) in industrial/organizational psychology is known as score banding, in which scores within a certain range are treated as equivalent (see Campion et al, 2001), with the goal of more representative hiring or promotion decisions. However, if scalar invariance holds, but metric invariance does not, the construct factor itself is different.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The test results gave applicants' scores on each test, their overall score (i.e., combination of the written and video tests), and their band based on the overall score. Specifically, scores were grouped into ranges called bands (in the present case, a 95% confidence interval based on the standard error of measurement) so that scores within bands were considered statistically equal (see Campion et al, 2001). Applicants were told at this time which bands were to be considered for further selection hurdles.…”
Section: Participants and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 The procedure developed and demonstrated in this study essentially sidesteps the score banding by simply pro viding options for treating MQ's as just another metric.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%