2022
DOI: 10.1029/2021jd035969
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Control of Plant and Soil Hydraulics on the Interannual Variability of Plant Carbon Uptake Over the Central US

Abstract: The interannual variability (IAV) of gross primary productivity (GPP) reflects the sensitivity of GPP to climate variations and contributes substantially to the variations and long‐term trend of the atmospheric CO2 growth rate. Analyses of three observation‐based GPP products indicate that their IAVs are consistently correlated to terrestrial water storage anomaly over the central US, where episodic droughts occur. A land surface model explicitly representing plant hydraulics and groundwater capillary rise wit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent study also confirms that many central US ecosystems' interannual variability in carbon uptake is driven by plant and soil hydraulics (X.-Y. Zhang et al, 2022). Despite this enhancement of GPP, respiration dominated interannual NEE variability across sites, thus offsetting any CO 2 fertilization effect (Bugmann & Bigler, 2011;Yu et al, 2021).…”
Section: Drivers Of Long-term Landscape C Variationmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…A recent study also confirms that many central US ecosystems' interannual variability in carbon uptake is driven by plant and soil hydraulics (X.-Y. Zhang et al, 2022). Despite this enhancement of GPP, respiration dominated interannual NEE variability across sites, thus offsetting any CO 2 fertilization effect (Bugmann & Bigler, 2011;Yu et al, 2021).…”
Section: Drivers Of Long-term Landscape C Variationmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…X. Zhang, Niu, et al. (2022) compared the simulations of a land surface model with two different soil water retention models. They found that the soil water content model with more reasonable soil hydraulics can produce a much more realistic gross primary productivity estimation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%