Abstract:Sources of profit change for Telstra, Australia's largest telecommunications firm, are examined. A new method allows for changes in a firm's profits to be broken down into separate effects due to productivity change, price changes and growth in the firm's size. This in turn allows us to calculate the distribution of the benefits of productivity improvements between consumers, labour and shareholders. The results show that around half the benefits from Telstra's productivity improvements from 1984 to 1994 were … Show more
“…Grifell-Tatjé and Lovell 1999;and Lawrence et al 2006). In this section we shed some new light on this connection from the perspective of the decomposition proposed in Sect.…”
“…Grifell-Tatjé and Lovell 1999;and Lawrence et al 2006). In this section we shed some new light on this connection from the perspective of the decomposition proposed in Sect.…”
“…This paper applies the firm‐level decomposition method, a summary of which is presented in this section. A full exposition of the methodology can be found in Lawrence et al. (2006).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper we apply the methodology of Lawrence et al. (2006) and Lawrence and Richards (2004) to determine the contributions of productivity and price changes to changes in Eskom's profitability over time.…”
The methodology developed by Lawrence, Diewert and Fox and Lawrence and Richards is used to determine the contribution of productivity and price changes to changes in Eskom's profitability over time. This methodology enables the calculation of the distribution of the benefits of Eskom's productivity improvements – its “productivity dividend”– among the three key stakeholder groups: consumers, input suppliers (including employees) and Eskom's owners. The results of this study show that Eskom passed on substantially more than the benefits from productivity improvements over the 10 years to 2002 to consumers in the form of real price reductions and to labour in the form of higher real wages.
“…(4) is analogous to a decomposition of profit found in the business literature in which the price effect reflects the ability to pass through input price changes, as Miller (1984) explains. 10 Our decomposition of dividend variation is structurally similar to the decomposition of the variation in the gross return to capital defined in Lawrence et al (2003) and defined in our notation as G = π + w K K.…”
Grifell-Tatjé, E., and Lovell, C.A. Knox-Decomposing the dividendMost theoretical and empirical research on cooperatives focuses on the comparative statics behavior of optimizing cooperatives. We focus on the magnitude and sources of variation in the dividend that cooperatives are presumed to maximize. Variation in the dividend leads to an inefficient allocation of labor among cooperatives. For a panel of 59 Spanish cooperative financial institutions, from 1994 to 2001, we decompose dividend variation into mutually exclusive and exhaustive sources. We also compare the performance of all other cooperative financial institutions to that of Caja Laboral Popular, which provides financial services to the Mondragón group of cooperatives.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.