2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10342-022-01505-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The contribution of understorey vegetation to ecosystem evapotranspiration in boreal and temperate forests: a literature review and analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 117 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, we assume that the observed lower topsoil moistures in larch stands compared to beech are the results of two reasons. Firstly, the light-demanding larch stands provide a favourable environment for developing a dense understory vegetation, that can contribute up to the one third of the total stand evapotranspiration, as reported by Balandier et al (2022). Secondly, the beech, as the only native species, is adapted to lower altitudes with limited precipitation and therefore, developed a highly effective recharge ability.…”
Section: The Specie-speci C Soil Moisture Regimesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…However, we assume that the observed lower topsoil moistures in larch stands compared to beech are the results of two reasons. Firstly, the light-demanding larch stands provide a favourable environment for developing a dense understory vegetation, that can contribute up to the one third of the total stand evapotranspiration, as reported by Balandier et al (2022). Secondly, the beech, as the only native species, is adapted to lower altitudes with limited precipitation and therefore, developed a highly effective recharge ability.…”
Section: The Specie-speci C Soil Moisture Regimesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Considering that understory vegetation is an important component of forest ecosystems, functional changes in understory vegetation can substantially affect forest structure and function, such as tree regeneration, carbonnutrient-water cycling, and stability (Gilliam, 2007;Gilliam et al, 2016;Giuggiola et al, 2018;Landuyt et al, 2019;Blondeel et al, 2020;Xing et al, 2022). For example, in a recent review, Balandier et al (2022) reported that understory vegetation contributed one-third of ecosystem evapotranspiration in boreal and temperate forests, and the removal of understory vegetation could reduce water competition, with subsequent consequence of increasing soil water content and stimulating sap flow and the growth of overstory tree species (e.g., mean annual radial growth increased by 4.6-fold, Giuggiola et al, 2018). Deng et al (2016) demonstrated that, when subjected to exogenous N inputs, understory vegetation have competitive advantages in terms of resource acquisition (e.g., P) compared with the corresponding young overstory trees.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%