2005
DOI: 10.1007/s00227-005-1583-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The contribution of seagrass beds (Zostera noltii) to the function of tidal flats as a juvenile habitat for dominant, mobile epibenthos in the Wadden Sea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
29
1
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
29
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The present study Table 2 MDS formed groups for the Z. noltii and eutrophic areas' production, with indication each group similarities (%) and the most representative species (%) contributing for the similarity within the group, determined with SIMPER analysis confirms the high estuarine production of the Mondego estuary and demonstrates that seagrass beds are more productive and support higher species richness than bare muddy/sandy areas, as seen also by Sprung (1994) and Heck et al (1995). Seagrass beds provide essential processes and services, such as nutrient cycling, detritial production and export, sediment stabilization and optimal habitat for growth, survival and reproduction for a variety of fish and invertebrate species (Heck et al, 2003;Cunha et al, 2005;Polte et al, 2005), which have been pointed out as the major reasons for the importance of the habitat. Yet, seagrass beds are in decline around the world (Short and Neckles, 1999;De Jonge and de Jong, 2002;Charpentier et al, 2005;Munkes, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The present study Table 2 MDS formed groups for the Z. noltii and eutrophic areas' production, with indication each group similarities (%) and the most representative species (%) contributing for the similarity within the group, determined with SIMPER analysis confirms the high estuarine production of the Mondego estuary and demonstrates that seagrass beds are more productive and support higher species richness than bare muddy/sandy areas, as seen also by Sprung (1994) and Heck et al (1995). Seagrass beds provide essential processes and services, such as nutrient cycling, detritial production and export, sediment stabilization and optimal habitat for growth, survival and reproduction for a variety of fish and invertebrate species (Heck et al, 2003;Cunha et al, 2005;Polte et al, 2005), which have been pointed out as the major reasons for the importance of the habitat. Yet, seagrass beds are in decline around the world (Short and Neckles, 1999;De Jonge and de Jong, 2002;Charpentier et al, 2005;Munkes, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…A major challenge for ecologists is the understanding of the ecosystem functioning and dynamics in the face of natural, anthropogenically-induced and extreme climate variability. One approach to this is through an analysis of the different components of the system contributing to production, widely used to assess the ecological integrity of ecosystems, including anthropogenic effects or climate change effects (Brey, 2001;Dolbeth et al, 2003;Cusson and Bourget, 2005;Polte et al, 2005). Here, changes are described in the macrobenthic secondary production of the Mondego estuary, Portugal, over a 10-year period, during which the system has undergone significant eutrophication and more recently has experienced extreme weather-related events.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the standing stock of the seagrass Zostera noltii in the intertidal region of the bight increased from 2960 mgC m −2 in 1995 to 17 282 mgC m −2 by 2010. Seagrass beds contribute to the function of tidal flats as an extended habitat for the juveniles of many species in the Wadden Sea, and seagrass beds are also considered to be indicators of ecosystem health (Polte et al 2005, Reise & Kohlus 2008, thus a positive development from an ecological point of view. The biomass of benthic grazers (Hydrobia ulvae and Littorina littorea) and some benthic detritus feeders (Arenicola marina, Capitellidae, Oligochaeta) increased from 1995 to 2010.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, the estuary might have lost part of its production potential for these species, explaining the differences found with other studies elsewhere. As an example, the fish production of P. microps is potentially much higher in eelgrass beds than in bare sand (Table 2; Polte et al, 2005) and the Mondego estuary seagrass beds were considerably reduced in the early 90's in the south arm, loosing part of it production potential (Dolbeth et al, 2007). Presently, the seagrass beds are recovering , allowing more alternative habitats and potentially increasing invertebrate production in the following years (Dolbeth et al, 2007), which may translate into higher fish productions.…”
Section: Species Temporal Dynamics and Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%