2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10346-014-0522-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The contribution of PSInSAR interferometry to landslide hazard in weak rock-dominated areas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
39
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
39
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Two commonly used methods were chosen: the bivariate statistical information value method (IV; Yin and Yan, 1988) and the infinite slope method (IS; Sharma, 2002) based on the calculation of the factor of safety (FS). Both methods are in line with the experts panel recommendations to assess landslide susceptibility (Cascini, 2008;Fell et al, 2008a, b;Corominas et al, 2014) and have been applied successfully in similar geological and geomorphological context in the region north of Lisbon (Zêzere, 2002;Pimenta, 2011;Guillard and Zêzere, 2012;Oliveira et al, 2015). In order to model the shallow slide susceptibility, the dependent variables (shallow slide training and validation groups), the independent dataset of variables used as predisposing factors, and the maps representing geotechnical and hydraulic parameters were rasterized using a pixel of 5 m × 5 m.…”
Section: Methods and Datasupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Two commonly used methods were chosen: the bivariate statistical information value method (IV; Yin and Yan, 1988) and the infinite slope method (IS; Sharma, 2002) based on the calculation of the factor of safety (FS). Both methods are in line with the experts panel recommendations to assess landslide susceptibility (Cascini, 2008;Fell et al, 2008a, b;Corominas et al, 2014) and have been applied successfully in similar geological and geomorphological context in the region north of Lisbon (Zêzere, 2002;Pimenta, 2011;Guillard and Zêzere, 2012;Oliveira et al, 2015). In order to model the shallow slide susceptibility, the dependent variables (shallow slide training and validation groups), the independent dataset of variables used as predisposing factors, and the maps representing geotechnical and hydraulic parameters were rasterized using a pixel of 5 m × 5 m.…”
Section: Methods and Datasupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Among them, two InSAR (interferometric synthetic aperture radar) techniques, PSInSAR (Ferretti et al 2001) and its evolution SqueeSAR (Ferretti et al 2011), have been widely exploited for the detection, mapping, definition of the state of activity, and monitoring of slow-moving landslide (Meisina et al 2008;Herrera et al 2011Herrera et al , 2013Bianchini et al 2013;Lu et al 2014;Notti et al 2014;Bianchini et al 2015a, b;Oliveira et al 2015;Raspini et al 2015;Bardi et al 2016;Calvello et al 2016;Béjar-Pizarro et al 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lu et al (2014) introduced an approach for updating landslide hazard and risk maps based on Persistent Scatterer Interferometry (PSI). Piacentini et al (2015) exploited the results of PSI analysis for the implementation of a statistical model for landslide susceptibility; on the same subject, Oliveira et al (2015) proposed a methodology to determine landslide susceptibility at regional scale in weak rock-dominated areas from Persistent Scatterer deformation maps. More recently, Ciampalini et al (2016) used PSInSAR data to refine landslide susceptibility maps and to reduce false negatives.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%