1988
DOI: 10.1037/0736-9735.5.4.305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The contribution of mother-infant mutual influence to the origins of self- and object representations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
270
0
10

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 416 publications
(287 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
(119 reference statements)
7
270
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Accordingly, other researchers have, in agreement with Kohut, described the failures of early attachment as the primary source of shame (Kaufman, 1989). Beebe and Lachman (1988), for instance, described shame as arising from caregiver failures, arguing that these failures teach the child to not expect the caregiver to participate the in their emotion-regulation. Speaking summarily, Lewis (1992) asserted that the failures of attachment figures to provide the child with needed psychological support creates a shameful disposition.…”
Section: Narcissism and Shamementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, other researchers have, in agreement with Kohut, described the failures of early attachment as the primary source of shame (Kaufman, 1989). Beebe and Lachman (1988), for instance, described shame as arising from caregiver failures, arguing that these failures teach the child to not expect the caregiver to participate the in their emotion-regulation. Speaking summarily, Lewis (1992) asserted that the failures of attachment figures to provide the child with needed psychological support creates a shameful disposition.…”
Section: Narcissism and Shamementioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 Both mother and baby adjust their responses to each other within seconds or fractions of seconds, according to discernible "rules" of mutual regulation that are made up as they go along (Beebe 1986;Beebe, Stern and Jaffe, 1979;Nadel et al 1999;Papoušek and Papoušek 1981;Stern 1971). Over much of the first year of the infant's life, the pair engage and disengage, synchronize and alternate, practicing their physical, physiological, and emotional "attunement" by means of these multimodal expressive signals.…”
Section: Proto-aesthetic Dispositions In Infantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 Abstracted from the socioaffective dialogue with the mother, these mental representations enable the infant to image the expectation of mutuality and reciprocity in social contact: of being matched by and being able to match the affective state of the partner, as well as "participating in the state of the other" (Beebe & Lachman, 1988). This process continues through childhood, where the skills of emotional awareness (including empathy for self and others) and impulse-and self-control are learned through relationships with parents, siblings, teachers and peers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%