2014
DOI: 10.1080/00222933.2013.825342
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The contribution of molecular data to our understanding of cephalopod evolution and systematics: a review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
51
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 216 publications
(309 reference statements)
2
51
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A range of molecular studies has been conducted on coleoids (Allcock et al . ), including population structure analysis using minisatellites, microsatellites and mitochondrial DNA (Dillane et al . ; Zheng et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A range of molecular studies has been conducted on coleoids (Allcock et al . ), including population structure analysis using minisatellites, microsatellites and mitochondrial DNA (Dillane et al . ; Zheng et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In spite of being heavily biased towards ammonites, as these paired measurements are extremely rare for other groups, the available data set on the relationship between IC and ES size is reasonably complete and sufficient for an initial assessment. For taxonomy we used the reviews of Shevyrev (2006 a , b ), Allcock, Lindgren & Strugnell () and Hoffmann ().…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To reconstruct the evolution of cephalopod reproductive strategies this data set was supported by non-paired data of either IC or ES in another 324 species of Ammonoidea,56 Belemnoidea,9 Coleoidea,10 Bactritida,125 Nautilida,6 Oncocerida,34 Orthocerida,9 Pseudorthocerida and 8 Tarphycerida. In spite of being heavily biased towards ammonites, as these paired measurements are extremely rare for other groups, the available data set on the relationship between IC and ES size is reasonably complete and sufficient for an initial assessment. For taxonomy we used the reviews of Shevyrev (2006a,b), Allcock, Lindgren & Strugnell (2014) and Hoffmann (2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for many marine taxa with wide distribution, identification and congruence of the morphological characters need to be reinforce using molecular markers; unfortunately oegopsids do not show high representativity in molecular analysis (Allcock et al 2014). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%