The Contribution of Low Birth Weight to Infant Mortality and Childhood Morbidity

Abstract

The low-birth-weight infant remains at much higher risk of mortality than the infant with normal weight at birth. In the neonatal period, when most infant deaths occur, the proportion of low-birth-weight infants, especially those with very low weight, is the major determinant of the magnitude of the mortality rates. Furthermore, differences in low-birth-weight rates account for the higher neonatal mortality rates observed in some groups, particularly those characterized by socioeconomic disadvantages. Much of the recent decline in neonatal mortality can be attributed to increased survival among low-birth-weight infants, apparently as a result of hospital-based services. The application of these services is currently considered cost-effective, although whether this will continue to be true in the future is unclear because of the increased survival of very tiny infants. Although low-birth-weight infants remain at increased risk of both postneonatal mortality and morbidity in infancy and early childhood, the risk is substantially smaller than that of neonatal death. In addition, these adverse later outcomes have not offset the gains achieved in the neonatal period. Nonetheless, the increased survival of high-risk infants raises concern about their future requirements for special medical and educational services and about the stress on their families. Despite increased access to antenatal services, only moderate declines in the proportion of low-birth-weight infants has been observed, and almost no change has occurred in the proportion of those with very low weight at birth. In addition, in many areas of the country the birth-weight-specific neonatal mortality rates are similar for groups at high and low risk of neonatal death. In view of these findings, continuation of the current decline in neonatal mortality and reduction of the mortality differentials between high- and low-risk groups require the identification and more effective implementation of strategies for the prevention of low-weight births.

Can Mothers Judge the Size of Their Newborn? Assessing the Determinants of a Mother's Perception of a Baby's Size at Birth

“…Birth weight is considered to be one of the most important determinants of child survival and health (McCormick, 1985;Kramer, 1987;Abrams & Newman, 1991;J. Biosoc.…”

Weight of the Crisis: Evidence from Newborns in Argentina

“…Although birth weight is the most important determinant of perinatal, neonatal and postneonatal outcomes (McCormick, 1985;Pollack and Divon, 1992), there is very limited evidence on its response to economic crises, as documented by the very recent survey by Friedman and Sturdy (2011). 4 The e¤ect that we uncover for the Argentine sudden-economic collapse is more than three times higher the 8.7-gram reduction 4 Lower-birth-weight babies have worse outcomes in terms of one-year mortality rates (Van den Berg, Lindeboom, and Portrait, 2006).…”

Outcome of Very Low Birth Weight Infants Exposed to Antenatal Indomethacin for Tocolysis

“…1 While only 11% of all pregnancies result in preterm birth, the majority of neonatal morbidity and deaths are related to preterm births. 2,3 The strict definition of premature birth includes all births before 37 weeks gestation, but most of the neonatal mortality and morbidity associated with prematurity results from births occurring before 32 weeks gestation (2% of all births).…”