2010
DOI: 10.1002/arp.395
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The contribution of geophysical prospecting in the reconstruction of the buried ancient environments of the house of Marcus Fabius Rufus (Pompeii, Italy)

Abstract: Anintegratedgeophysicalstudy wascarriedoutina Romanhouseinthearchaeologicalareaof Pompeii (Italy).Thehouse, once ownedby Marcus Fabius Rufus, isanimportant architecturalbuildingoverlookingalarge gardenthatislikely to contain buried archaeological structures.The geophysical survey was planned to support an archaeological reconstruction oftheresidentialcomplex, whichwasbased onthe assumptionthat thehouse wassurroundedbyan arcade.Electromagnetic data allowed us to assess the most promising areas for investigating… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different geophysical methods were applied to test their resolution in the considered geological setting as well as to provide an effective and detailed model of the subsoil, which is supplied whenever a multi-methodological approach is adopted (e.g. Patella et al, 2000;Piro et al, 2003;Meola et al, 2005;Linford, 2006;Kvamme, 2006;Schmidt, 2009;Di Maio et al, 2010). Specifically, high resolution surveys of magnetic, frequency-domain EM, groundpenetrating radar and direct current geoelectric measurements were performed.…”
Section: Non-destructive Geophysical Exploration Of the Phaistos Archmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different geophysical methods were applied to test their resolution in the considered geological setting as well as to provide an effective and detailed model of the subsoil, which is supplied whenever a multi-methodological approach is adopted (e.g. Patella et al, 2000;Piro et al, 2003;Meola et al, 2005;Linford, 2006;Kvamme, 2006;Schmidt, 2009;Di Maio et al, 2010). Specifically, high resolution surveys of magnetic, frequency-domain EM, groundpenetrating radar and direct current geoelectric measurements were performed.…”
Section: Non-destructive Geophysical Exploration Of the Phaistos Archmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of different geophysical methods, as shown previously in other studies (e.g. Leopold et al ., 2010; Lowe and Fogel, 2010; Maio et al ., 2010), was especially valuable in this case because magnetometry failed, but GPR and two‐ and three‐dimensional ERT surveys produced good results, which substituted for the other method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The typical problems of this complex are: water infiltration, degradation of the building materials and inner inhomogeneities [19]. The inspection with infrared thermography was carried out in two rooms of the House, the northeast wall of the room 82 (figure 5b) and the south-west wall of the room 80 (figure 5c).…”
Section: In-situ Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%