The contribution of drought‐related decreases in foliar nitrogen concentration to decreases in photosynthetic capacity during and after drought in prairie grasses

Abstract

The contribution of drought-related decreases in foliar nitrogen concentration to decreases in photosynthetic capacity during and after drought in prairie grasses While stomatal closure usually limits photosynthesis during drought, our previous results suggest that drought-related decreases in foliar nitrogen concentration (NL) limit photosynthesis during recovery from drought in prairie grasses. Here we estimate the importance of decreases in NL to decreased photosynthetic capacity (PSeap) during drought and a subsequent recovery period in three perennial C4 prairie grasses. PScap (O2 evolution at light and CO2 saturation) decreased 69 to 78% during drought in these grasses, and full recovery of PS^ap required 8 to 12 days, until younger leaves were expanded or older leaves were repaired, depending on species. Decreases in NL explained 38 to 51% of the loss of PScap during drought and accounted for 51 to 69% of the total loss of PS^ap integrated over the post-drought recovery period. N-related loss of PScap appeared to result more from decreases in ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (EC 4.1.1.39), phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase (4.1.1.31), and other soluble photosynthetic enzymes, than from decreases in thylakoid N-containing compounds. Decreases in quantum yield of O2 evolution and Fv/Fn, (variable-to-maximum fluorescence of dark-adapted leaves) during drought were small, so we assumed that little damage to photsystem II (PSII) and thylakoid membrane function occurred. Further, Fo (minimum F) decreased or remained unchanged, dark Fo was greater than light Fo, and decreases in photochemical quenching (the fraction of oxidized PSII) were reversed within 1-3 days after drought. Therefore, prolonged increases in nonphotochemical quenching (q,,; thermal dissipation of excess light energy) during and after drought were indicative of protective downregulation and were likely associated with disproportionate loss of soluble photosynthetic proteins during drought. In support of this, post-drought recovery of qn paralleled recovery of NL and PScap. Thus, in C4 prairie grasses, loss of PS^ap during drought is largely the result of decreases in shoot NL and of associated protective downregulation, decreasing carbon assimilation for 1 -2 weeks after drought.

Ecological genomics: making the leap from model systems in the lab to native populations in the field

“…Indeed, despite expectations of significant variation in gene expression due to cross-hybridizing A gerardii cDNA with maize cDNA, as well as that associated with more variable environmental conditions in the field, we were able to detect consistent and significant up-and down-regulation of a number of genes, particularly those associated with photosynthesis, carbon fixation, and stress response. Importantly, the responses we observed at the gene level are consistent with observed physiological responses to the altered precipitation treatments Knapp et al 2002) and, more generally, to water stress (Heckathorn et al 1997).…”

Contrasting physiological responsiveness of establishing trees and a C4 grass to rainfall events, intensified summer drought, and warming in oak savanna

“…In terms of phenotypic appearance, the grass showed reduced green leaf area and increasing leaf senescence as the summer progressed. Drought-induced canopy senescence in C 4 grasses is associated with N reallocation from leaves to belowground structures which may further delay photosynthetic recovery following drought (Heckathorn et al, 1997). Grasses replace leaf canopy following severe drought by the production of new leaves and tillers from apical meristems and axillary buds near the soil surface when favorable growth conditions resume (Welker & Briske, 1992;Hendrickson & Briske, 1997;Dalgleish & Hartnett, 2006).…”

Water stress induces different levels of photosynthesis and electron transport rate regulation in grapevines

“…In the main experiment described above withholding watering also involved the interruption in the supply of nitrogen and other nutrients. The importance of a nitrogen deficit during water stress on plant photosynthetic performance has been recently reported (McDonald & Davies 1996;Heckathorn, De Lucia & Zielinski 1997). In order to discriminate the effects of nutrient versus water deficiency, a second complementary experiment was made on the same plants in the summer of 1997.…”