Exposure to an acute stressor of inescapable swimming or intermittent tailshocks impairs classical eyeblink conditioning 24 h later in female rats (Wood, Beylin, & Shors, 2001). This effect is often attributed to a deficit in "learning," but since stress has been shown to induce analgesia (Jackson, Maier, & Coon, 1979), an alternative explanation is that stressor exposure reduces conditioning by lessening the perceived intensity of the unconditioned stimulus (US). To address this possibility we examined the amplitude of the unconditioned response (UR) during training and found that although exposure to the stressor impaired trace conditioning, there was no difference in the UR amplitude. We also found that eyeblink responses to different US intensities (4-12 V) in the absence of training were unaffected by stressor exposure. Taken together, these experiments indicate that the stress-induced impairment of conditioning in females is not due to a decreased perception of US strength.
KeywordsSex differences; Estrogen; Analgesia; Hippocampus; Unconditioned stimulus; Performance; Gender Classical eyeblink conditioning is becoming an increasingly important paradigm for the study of learning. In our rat version of eyeblink conditioning, a white noise conditioned stimulus (CS) precedes and predicts an unconditioned stimulus (US), which is a periorbital shock to the eyelid. Through this pairing, the CS comes to elicit an eyeblink, or conditioned response (CR). Using this paradigm we have found that exposure to an acute stressor of inescapable tailshocks or forced swimming facilitates classical eyeblink conditioning 24 h later in male rats (Beylin & Shors, 1998;Shors, Weiss, & Thompson, 1992). In females, however, exposure to these same stressors impairs eyeblink conditioning (Shors, Lewczyk, Pacynski, Mathew, & Pickett, 1998;Wood, Beylin, & Shors, 2001;Wood & Shors, 1998). In both cases, stress is thought to modulate learning directly, but an alternative interpretation is that prior stressor exposure affects performance during eyeblink conditioning, and not learning, per se. In males, several possible performance explanations have been addressed (Servatius, Brennan, Beck, Beldowicz, & Coyle-DiNorcia, 2001;Shors, 2001), but less has been done to rule out performance deficits in females (but see Wood & Shors, 1998). Most notably, acute exposure to inescapable shock has been shown to induce analgesia 24 h after the stress or exposure if animals are "reminded" of the event (Jackson, Maier, & Coon, 1979). So, there remains the possibility that analgesia caused by stressor exposure prior to training reduces the perceived intensity of the training stimuli. If, for example, the US eyelid shock is perceived as less intense-and is therefore less salient-less conditioning would occur in stressed females.
NIH Public AccessAuthor Manuscript Neurobiol Learn Mem. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2012 May 30.One way of evaluating the salience of the US is to examine the magnitude of the UR. A more salient US will elicit an ey...