Mössbauer Spectroscopy 2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-32220-4_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Contribution of 57Fe Mössbauer Spectrometry to Investigate Magnetic Nanomaterials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 177 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such line shape broadening typically results from a distribution in the θ angle between the applied field and the hyperfine field, which is opposite to the magnetic moment. The asymmetry appears similar to that expected of a system with a sperimagnetic structure [35], and in this case is consistent with a mean orientation of Fe 3+ moments in Fe 2 F 5 (Htaz) oriented in the opposite direction to the applied magnetic field. Such a structure differs from that observed in Fe 2 F 5 (H 2 O) 2 [34], but, at this stage, one does consider how the application of an external magnetic field and the cooling conditions affect the hyperfine structure of Fe 2 F 5 (Htaz).…”
Section: (C) Mössbauer Spectrometrysupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Such line shape broadening typically results from a distribution in the θ angle between the applied field and the hyperfine field, which is opposite to the magnetic moment. The asymmetry appears similar to that expected of a system with a sperimagnetic structure [35], and in this case is consistent with a mean orientation of Fe 3+ moments in Fe 2 F 5 (Htaz) oriented in the opposite direction to the applied magnetic field. Such a structure differs from that observed in Fe 2 F 5 (H 2 O) 2 [34], but, at this stage, one does consider how the application of an external magnetic field and the cooling conditions affect the hyperfine structure of Fe 2 F 5 (Htaz).…”
Section: (C) Mössbauer Spectrometrysupporting
confidence: 85%
“…This detailed characterization of magnetic properties by coupling VSM and 57 Fe Mö ssbauer spectrometry has never been reported so far for iron-oxide-MOF composites to the best of our knowledge, although the magnetic properties of pure maghemite and magnetite NPs were fully described in the last decades. [73][74][75][76][77][78] S13), thereby confirming two trends: (1) MIL/USPIO-cit particles appear more magnetic than g-Fe 2 O 3 -cit, whereas (2) MIL/USPIO particles seem to hold a smaller magnetic moment. These variations are significant but relatively small, and their explanation would require a dedicated investigation.…”
Section: Colloidal Stability Of Nano-objects In Physiologic Serum Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Therefore, the formation of complexed/precipitated As species at the surface of the nano-Fe 3 O 4 adsorbent is one of the main adsorption mechanisms [ 93 , 101 , 102 ]. The p Ka values of As acid are p Ka 1 ≈ 2.3, p Ka 2 ≈ 7.0, and p Ka 3 ≈ 11.5, indicating that the molecular form mainly exists in a solution at a pH < 2.0, while the anionic species (H 2 AsO 4 − or HAsO 4 2− ) exists at a pH in the interval 2–10 [ 14 ]. At pH < pH p.z.c.…”
Section: In-detail Discussion Of the Adsorbent Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, while Cornell et al [ 1 ] summarized very well the distinct crystallographic and magnetic properties of Fe 3 O 4 and γ-Fe 2 O 3 at a bulk state, Greneche [ 14 ] devoted decades to the study of nano-γ-Fe 2 O 3 and composites, including core–shell models. Regarding this issue, the present review has no intention to diminish previous findings and studies; instead, it invites the research community to have in mind the most important differences between both magnetic phases and, hence, their critical determination that is crucial in many applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%