2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The contralateral delay activity as a neural measure of visual working memory

Abstract: The contralateral delay activity (CDA) is a negative slow wave sensitive to the number of objects maintained in visual working memory (VWM). In recent years, a growing number of labs started to use the CDA in order to investigate VWM, leading to many fascinating discoveries. Here, we discuss the recent developments and contribution of the CDA in various research fields. Importantly, we report two meta-analyses that unequivocally validate the relationship between the set-size increase in the CDA amplitude and t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

25
245
3
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 277 publications
(309 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
25
245
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The CDA is considered to be a marker of visual working memory storage (Vogel & Machizawa, 2004; McCollough, Machizawa, & Vogel, 2007; Luria, Balaban, Awh, & Vogel, 2016; but see Eimer & Kiss, 2010; Katus & Eimer, 2015; Berggren & Eimer, 2016), and so the present results fit with the possibility that participants store alphanumeric and verbal stimuli in visual working memory during change detection tasks such as the one used here. These results also fit well with fMRI studies that show recruitment of posterior parietal cortex (PPC) for both simple visual stimuli and for verbal stimuli (Todd & Marois, 2004; Majerus et al, 2011; 2014), suggesting that PPC could participate in maintaining diverse codes (Xu, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The CDA is considered to be a marker of visual working memory storage (Vogel & Machizawa, 2004; McCollough, Machizawa, & Vogel, 2007; Luria, Balaban, Awh, & Vogel, 2016; but see Eimer & Kiss, 2010; Katus & Eimer, 2015; Berggren & Eimer, 2016), and so the present results fit with the possibility that participants store alphanumeric and verbal stimuli in visual working memory during change detection tasks such as the one used here. These results also fit well with fMRI studies that show recruitment of posterior parietal cortex (PPC) for both simple visual stimuli and for verbal stimuli (Todd & Marois, 2004; Majerus et al, 2011; 2014), suggesting that PPC could participate in maintaining diverse codes (Xu, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…However, we observed no significant differences in CDA magnitude between these trial types. If the CDA reflects the number of items being actively maintained in VSTM (reviewed in Luria et al, 2016) and retro-cues reduce this number in the present experiment from two to one, one might predict a reduction in CDA magnitude following the retro-cue. Previous studies have often investigated the CDA for stimuli that may lack preexisting semantic representations, unlike the stimuli used in the current study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The CDA amplitude likely reflects the number of items held in working memory (Luria et al, 2016;Vogel and Machizawa, 2004). In contrast to healthy controls, the CDA amplitude was attenuated in PD patients, possibly indicating that PD patients have difficulty retaining all relevant information in visual working memory.…”
Section: Memorymentioning
confidence: 95%