2000
DOI: 10.1006/jcph.2000.6577
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Continuous Galerkin Method Is Locally Conservative

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
153
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 221 publications
(153 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(11 reference statements)
0
153
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The integrals on P can, therefore, be expressed as a sum of integrals on the sub-volumes P ′ and P . This leads to the following decomposition of convective and diffusive integrals: We will now focus our attention on the behavior of the integrals in (38) and (39) as x n → 0. First it is easy to see that P ′ tends to P as x n tends to zero…”
Section: Relationship Between the Find Derivatives And The Auxiliary mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The integrals on P can, therefore, be expressed as a sum of integrals on the sub-volumes P ′ and P . This leads to the following decomposition of convective and diffusive integrals: We will now focus our attention on the behavior of the integrals in (38) and (39) as x n → 0. First it is easy to see that P ′ tends to P as x n tends to zero…”
Section: Relationship Between the Find Derivatives And The Auxiliary mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…is the normal derivative of the velocity computed at node P. Alternatively, an FE problem for a boundary node with a Dirichlet condition can also be expressed using of the auxiliary flux as proposed by Hughes et al [38] in the form:…”
Section: Relationship Between the Find Derivatives And The Auxiliary mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The mass error used to evaluate local conservation in these applications to date has typically been computed element-wise using a volumetric approach by which the discrete form of the primitive conservation law is formulated using physical arguments, see [8] for example. While conceptually satisfying, this approach is inconsistent with the finite element basis and equations used to solve the GWCE itself as brought to light by Berger and Howington [3] and Hughes et al [6]. In their work, Berger and Howington [31 show how to define partial fluxes in such a way as to be consistent with the local CG conservation statement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%