2021
DOI: 10.1363/2021.33301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Continuing Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic in the United States: Findings from the 2021 Guttmacher Survey of Reproductive Health Experiences

Abstract: In this report, we analyze the 2021 data, focusing on how respondents feel the COVID-19 pandemic has influenced their sexual and reproductive health in two core areas: fertility preferences and access to care, including use of telehealth. We note disparities according to individuals’ race and ethnicity, sexual orientation, gender identity, income level and economic well-being. To assess the ongoing scope and magnitude of the impacts of the pandemic, we also examine findings on comparable measures from the 2020… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
(3 reference statements)
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Along with changes by organization type, we found declines in contraceptive and STI services throughout the first year of the pandemic, as well as variation with regional COVID‐19 rates. These findings align with reports of ongoing difficulties accessing reproductive health services, which were more common among people who match the sociodemographic profile of Title X clients 2,3,24 . To minimize face‐to‐face contact, mail‐order and curbside pickup became common modes of short‐acting hormonal method provision during the pandemic 10 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Along with changes by organization type, we found declines in contraceptive and STI services throughout the first year of the pandemic, as well as variation with regional COVID‐19 rates. These findings align with reports of ongoing difficulties accessing reproductive health services, which were more common among people who match the sociodemographic profile of Title X clients 2,3,24 . To minimize face‐to‐face contact, mail‐order and curbside pickup became common modes of short‐acting hormonal method provision during the pandemic 10 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…These findings align with reports of ongoing difficulties accessing reproductive health services, which were more common among people who match the sociodemographic profile of Title X clients. 2,3,24 To minimize faceto-face contact, mail-order and curbside pickup became common modes of short-acting hormonal method provision during the pandemic. 10 The flexibility of providing these methods was reflected in our findings, as short-acting hormonal method initiation was the least volatile service we studied.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of 61 contraceptive clinics across the US surveyed in April, August, and November 2020, over half experienced service interruptions at some point during their study period and 79% introduced or expanded telehealth for contraceptive counseling in response to the pandemic 10 . Patients also reported canceling and delaying SRH care or having trouble receiving contraception due to the pandemic—notably an impact that has continued but become less prevalent as the pandemic has continued 11,12 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 10 Patients also reported canceling and delaying SRH care or having trouble receiving contraception due to the pandemic—notably an impact that has continued but become less prevalent as the pandemic has continued. 11 , 12 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas other studies report comparable rates of IPV prior to the pandemic and during the pandemic, 21 , 22 experts also raise concern that limitation in movement during the pandemic would result in difficulties linking victims of IPV with support services. 23 , 24 For example, Lindberg et al 25 indicate that 33% of women who reported experiences of IPV in early 2020 had difficulty seeking services in response to an experience of IPV. This is concerning, given data collected by Buttell et al 26 over 10 weeks in April of 2020, which found that individuals experiencing IPV during this time period reported significantly less resilience and greater perceived stress than those not experiencing IPV during this early time in the pandemic.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%