“…Today it is the most common acute abdominal condition reported from many centres in West Africa 1,7,14–16 . The difficulties associated with the diagnosis of acute appendicitis are well known 17–21 . In this series the negative appendicectomy rate of 25% is similar to rates of 15–30% reported by other investigators 22–25 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…1,7,[14][15][16] The difficulties associated with the diagnosis of acute appendicitis are well known. [17][18][19][20][21] In this series the negative appendicectomy rate of 25% is similar to rates of 15-30% reported by other investigators. [22][23][24][25] The high rate of negative appendicectomies is because of the difficulties in making an accurate preoperative diagnosis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…In this series the negative appendicectomy rate of 25% is similar to rates of 15–30% reported by other investigators 22–25 . The high rate of negative appendicectomies is because of the difficulties in making an accurate preoperative diagnosis 17–21 . In our environment, some tropical enteric infections and infestations such as salmonelosis of the terminal ileum and amoebiasis of the ceacum might be mistaken for acute appendicitis 7 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[22][23][24][25] The high rate of negative appendicectomies is because of the difficulties in making an accurate preoperative diagnosis. [17][18][19][20][21] In our environment, some tropical enteric infections and infestations such as salmonelosis of the terminal ileum and amoebiasis of the ceacum might be mistaken for acute appendicitis. 7 In young women, a high negative appendicectomy rate is often accepted because of the presence of gynaecological conditions, which may mimic appendicitis.…”
Acute appendicitis, typhoid ileal perforation, acute intestinal obstruction and gastroduodenal perforations were the leading causes of acute admissions for abdominal pain to our hospital. Late presentation was associated with increased mortality.
“…Today it is the most common acute abdominal condition reported from many centres in West Africa 1,7,14–16 . The difficulties associated with the diagnosis of acute appendicitis are well known 17–21 . In this series the negative appendicectomy rate of 25% is similar to rates of 15–30% reported by other investigators 22–25 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…1,7,[14][15][16] The difficulties associated with the diagnosis of acute appendicitis are well known. [17][18][19][20][21] In this series the negative appendicectomy rate of 25% is similar to rates of 15-30% reported by other investigators. [22][23][24][25] The high rate of negative appendicectomies is because of the difficulties in making an accurate preoperative diagnosis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…In this series the negative appendicectomy rate of 25% is similar to rates of 15–30% reported by other investigators 22–25 . The high rate of negative appendicectomies is because of the difficulties in making an accurate preoperative diagnosis 17–21 . In our environment, some tropical enteric infections and infestations such as salmonelosis of the terminal ileum and amoebiasis of the ceacum might be mistaken for acute appendicitis 7 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[22][23][24][25] The high rate of negative appendicectomies is because of the difficulties in making an accurate preoperative diagnosis. [17][18][19][20][21] In our environment, some tropical enteric infections and infestations such as salmonelosis of the terminal ileum and amoebiasis of the ceacum might be mistaken for acute appendicitis. 7 In young women, a high negative appendicectomy rate is often accepted because of the presence of gynaecological conditions, which may mimic appendicitis.…”
Acute appendicitis, typhoid ileal perforation, acute intestinal obstruction and gastroduodenal perforations were the leading causes of acute admissions for abdominal pain to our hospital. Late presentation was associated with increased mortality.
“…Langman17 suggested that the decline in admission rates for acute appendicitis in England and Wales between the 1950s and the 1970s, accompanied by a concomitant increase in admissions for abdominal pain of uncertain cause, might in part be the result of reclassification. The importance of early recognition and treatment of perforated appendicitis has traditionally been emphasized, so in doubtful cases surgeons felt obliged to operate without delay18. More recently the entity of acute non‐specific abdominal pain was recognized, and a regimen of active observation described19–21, for patients presenting with symptoms and signs compatible with acute appendicitis but then settling over the next few hours.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.