2013 IEEE 21st International Symposium on Modelling, Analysis and Simulation of Computer and Telecommunication Systems 2013
DOI: 10.1109/mascots.2013.16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Continued Evolution of Web Traffic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Contemporary HTTP requests that perform browsing often convey hundreds of bytes (or even kilobytes) of supplemental information in HTTP headers [NJA13] [Ram]. If this meta-information and application-specific data is placed in the Interest name, there may be a significant additional overhead on intermediary NDN routers.…”
Section: Name Componentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Contemporary HTTP requests that perform browsing often convey hundreds of bytes (or even kilobytes) of supplemental information in HTTP headers [NJA13] [Ram]. If this meta-information and application-specific data is placed in the Interest name, there may be a significant additional overhead on intermediary NDN routers.…”
Section: Name Componentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address this concern we might consider a limit on the size of Interest packets. A 4KB limit, for example, would be adequate for most current Web-like interactions [NJA13].…”
Section: Application Data Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first concern is related to stateful packet forwarding in NDN. Contemporary HTTP requests that perform browsing often convey hundreds of bytes (or even kilobytes) of supplemental information in HTTP headers [11] [12]. If this metainformation and application-specific data is placed in the Interest name, there may be a significant additional overhead on intermediary NDN routers.…”
Section: Name Componentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…a) Expected differences across browsers: Most of the expected differences between browsers are related to the way TCP connections are managed (Fig 1 (a)-(b)). [7] found that a fraction of TCP connections were terminated after a predefined threshold amount of time. This observation was attributed to the browsers closing persistent connections that were idle for a specified amount of time.…”
Section: Impact Of Browsers On Webpage Trafficmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methodologically, numerous studies have analyzed web traffic logs collected on highly-aggregated links or proxies [5], [6], [4], [7]-while such aggregated data sources offer rich and voluminous data, they are not suitable for our goal of analyzing the impact of client diversity on the webpage download event, for the following reasons:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%