1998
DOI: 10.1080/096381898336484
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Contingency Model of Governmental Accounting Innovations: a discussion

Abstract: Comparative International Governmental Accounting Research (CIGAR) has been carried out for some twelve years. CIGAR research is, however, generally unfamiliar to researchers not belonging to the CIGAR network. Therefore, the paper aims at presenting and discussing critically CIGAR research with its Contingency Model of Governmental Accounting Innovations and suggests how CIGAR research and its Contingency Model could be developed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…NOTES 1 Other authors also emphasize the relevance of financial stress to accounting change in government; see for example Laughlin and Pallot (1998) and Monsen and NÌsi (1998). 2 Other authors (like Humphrey, et al, 1993, p. 14) prefer to use the term`Accountable Management' instead of`New Public Management'.…”
Section: Empirical Results About the Financial Stress Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 95%
“…NOTES 1 Other authors also emphasize the relevance of financial stress to accounting change in government; see for example Laughlin and Pallot (1998) and Monsen and NÌsi (1998). 2 Other authors (like Humphrey, et al, 1993, p. 14) prefer to use the term`Accountable Management' instead of`New Public Management'.…”
Section: Empirical Results About the Financial Stress Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 95%
“…These are some of the reasons that have traditionally justified the adoption of specific accounting tools in the public sector and which have often prevented governmental organizations from the adoption of private-sector accounting systems and standards (Aiken & Capitanio, 1995;Anessi Pessina & Steccolini, 2007;Christiaens & Rommel, 2006;Conn, 1996;Guthrie, 1998;Guthrie & Johnson, 1994;IPSASB, 2010;Monsen, 2002;Monsen & Näsi, 1998Montesinos, Pina, & Vela, 1995). Yet, a number of countries and international institutions have adopted or are currently deciding on the adoption of IPSASs, whose origins are rooted in private-sector practices and standards.…”
Section: Public Versus Private: the Ongoing Debatementioning
confidence: 95%
“…Nevertheless, the Contingency Model has been criticized as regards the concept of public accounting innovation it uses, especially considering the change from a cash-based public accounting system to one based on accrual as an innovation (Monsen and Näsi, 1998). We defend the position that introducing accrual can well be considered a public accounting innovation (Chan et al 1996;Ouda, 2001Ouda, , 2004.…”
Section: Literature Review and Research Issuesmentioning
confidence: 98%