2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2011.12.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The continental-oceanic climatic gradient impose clinal variation in vernalization response in Arabidopsis thaliana

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
28
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
28
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The influence of climatic factors such as altitude and precipitation on flowering time patterns reported in Jensen et al . (2011 a ) has also been observed in ecotypes of Arabidopsis in Norway, where distance from the coast, and altitude, were found to explain much of the variation in flowering times following vernalization (Lewandowska-Sabat et al ., 2012). A similar effect in Miscanthus can be seen, where flowering variation is better explained as a function of altitude, precipitation, and temperature, rather than simply by latitude and longitude.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The influence of climatic factors such as altitude and precipitation on flowering time patterns reported in Jensen et al . (2011 a ) has also been observed in ecotypes of Arabidopsis in Norway, where distance from the coast, and altitude, were found to explain much of the variation in flowering times following vernalization (Lewandowska-Sabat et al ., 2012). A similar effect in Miscanthus can be seen, where flowering variation is better explained as a function of altitude, precipitation, and temperature, rather than simply by latitude and longitude.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Additional studies that have looked into regional adaptation identified factors in addition to climate, including soil and competition to be important at the within‐region spatial scale (Lewandowska‐Sabat et al . ; Brachi et al . ; Manzano‐Piedras et al .…”
Section: Testing For Evidence Of Climate Adaptation In the Native Rangementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinal variation in the genome, growth parameters, multiple life history traits, and responses to, and tolerance of, low (freezing and chilling) and high temperature, drought, and irradiance (ultraviolet, visible, and far-red) in this species has been documented in numerous studies and typically presented in the context of a geographic gradient in one or more environmental factors (e.g., temperature, photoperiod, precipitation). Altitude has been the primary geographic variable in some studies ( Ward and Strain, 1997 ; Montesinos-Navarro et al, 2011 , 2012 ; Picó, 2012 ; Wolfe and Tonsor, 2014 ; Botto, 2015 ; Luo et al, 2015 ; Singh et al, 2015 ; Vidigal et al, 2016 ), whereas a combination of altitude and distance from the ocean was examined in a few others ( Montesinos et al, 2009 ; Lewandowska-Sabat et al, 2012 ; Kang et al, 2013 ). Variation (especially genetic) along longitudinal gradients has also been considered in a number of studies ( Schmuths et al, 2004 ; Beck et al, 2008 ; Reininga et al, 2009 ; Panthee et al, 2011 ; Samis et al, 2012 ; Zuther et al, 2012 ; Brachi et al, 2015 ), and edaphic, biotic, and/or environmental factors were shown to correlate with genomic variation and life history traits in several studies ( Lasky et al, 2012 ; Brachi et al, 2013 ; Manzano-Piedras et al, 2014 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%