The context and potential sustainability of traditional terrestrial periodic tambu areas: insights from Manus Island, Papua New Guinea

Abstract

Within the Pacific over the last two decades there has been greater recognition of the pre-existing tools within indigenous communities for natural resource management. Periodic tambu (Tok Pisin: a prohibition) is an indigenous resource management tool often used across Papua New Guinea. On Manus Island terrestrial periodic tambu areas are characterised by a cycle of resource closure followed by instantaneous harvest. We examine the differing application of periodic tambu areas by three different clans who are using the technique to restock areas with the Admiralty cuscus (Phalangeridae: Spilocuscus kraemeri), an arboreal possum-like marsupial. We examined the plausibility of cuscus population recovery over differing closure periods at three different harvest rates using a composite female-only population projection matrix approach based on the vital rates of closely related phalangerid surrogates. The resultant trajectories suggest that commonly used closure durations may allow recovery at low to medium harvest rates (10–30%) but not at high harvest rates (50%). From this we infer that periodic tambu areas may be a sustainable strategy for customary resource use of Admiralty cuscus at low to medium harvest rates. We found periodic tambu management on Manus Island to be culturally dynamic with clans differing with respect to their purpose, adherence to tradition, and hybridisation with modern land governance practices. Given the past difficulties of imposing exogenous conservation systems in Papua New Guinea, we advocate greater exploration of the merits of endogenous systems such as periodic tambu areas.

An Indigenous perspective on the conservation of an insular endemic: the prehensile-tailed skink Corucia zebrata on the Solomon Islands

“…We classified habitats using the established Solomon Islands forest types: montane, hill or ridge, lowland and coastal (Shenk, 1994). We also questioned whether the species was tabu (Solomon pidgin: to ban, or ‘no take’), an Indigenous resource management method practised throughout Melanesia (Whitmore et al, 2016; Basel et al, 2020) that involves setting up a no harvest zone in a patch of forest or on a reef. This ban on resource harvesting may be occasioned by the death of a chief or village elder, or in preparation for a forthcoming community feast.…”

Culture, kastom and conservation in Melanesia: what happens when worldviews collide?

“…Whitmore 2015), but they hold this knowledge through different sets of worldviews that need to be recognised and valued. Conservation interventions that build on customary knowledge and practice, while integrating science in a culturally sensitive way, will be much more likely to be recognised as legitimate and implemented (Walter and Hamilton 2014;Whitmore et al 2016).…”

Thinking globally, acting locally – conservation lessons from Oceania

“…In this special issue we explore a range of examples from national to local scales including systematic conservation planning approaches for designing protected areas (e.g. use of Zonation in New Zealand, Jackson and Lundquist 2016) to community-based management through local adaptation of traditional approaches to achieve biodiversity conservation goals (tambu areas in PNG, Whitmore et al 2016). Classic identification and restriction of access to resources remains a key tool in developed countries with strong rule of law, often applied at large scales, but they may require adaptation in other contexts.…”

“…At a local scale, traditional resource management options can be particularly powerful. Wendt et al (2016) and Whitmore et al (2016) exemplify two innovative approaches adapting mainstream conservation approaches restricting human access to priority areas using locally relevant processes and tools. Wendt et al (2016) adapt globally recognised conservation planning tools (Marxan) to the local context of Kadavu, Fiji, integrating planning outputs with local stakeholder participation.…”

“…Wendt et al (2016) adapt globally recognised conservation planning tools (Marxan) to the local context of Kadavu, Fiji, integrating planning outputs with local stakeholder participation. Whitmore et al (2016) test how the traditional resource management tool of tambu areas, which close and open a resource for harvest, affect conservation of Admiralty cuscus. Understanding how populations of key resources (e.g.…”