2009
DOI: 10.1177/0007650309345420
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Contested Politics of Corporate Governance

Abstract: The Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) has successfully become institutionalized as the preeminent global framework for voluntary corporate environmental and social reporting. Its success can be attributed to the "institutional entrepreneurs" who analyzed the reporting field and deployed discursive, material, and organizational strategies to change it. GRI has, however, fallen short of the aspirations of its founders to use disclosure to empower NGOs. We argue that its trajectory reflects the power relations am… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
65
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 242 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(50 reference statements)
3
65
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…GRI, a non-profit organization established in 1997, has developed a framework which includes the guidelines for "triple bottom-line" (economic, environmental and social) reporting (Wilson, 2013). The idea of GRI is to institutionalize sustainability reporting practices in a similar way to financial reporting standards: companies and all other types of organizations voluntarily prepare reports on their sustainability practices in a standard format on a regular basis (Gilbert, Rasche, & Waddock, 2011;Levy, Brown, & De Jong, 2009). The usage of a common set of indicators and principles enables benchmarking and comparisons of data between different companies, industries, and geographical regions.…”
Section: Discussion: Implications For Sustainability Reportingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GRI, a non-profit organization established in 1997, has developed a framework which includes the guidelines for "triple bottom-line" (economic, environmental and social) reporting (Wilson, 2013). The idea of GRI is to institutionalize sustainability reporting practices in a similar way to financial reporting standards: companies and all other types of organizations voluntarily prepare reports on their sustainability practices in a standard format on a regular basis (Gilbert, Rasche, & Waddock, 2011;Levy, Brown, & De Jong, 2009). The usage of a common set of indicators and principles enables benchmarking and comparisons of data between different companies, industries, and geographical regions.…”
Section: Discussion: Implications For Sustainability Reportingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GRI is a non-governmental and non-profit organization established in 1997 by the CERES (Coalition for Environmentally Responsible Economies) and the UNEP (United Nations Environmental Program) (Campos et al, 2013;Levy, Szejnwald Brown, & de Jong, 2010;Willis, 2003).…”
Section: Sustainability Indicators and The Grimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it has not yet resulted in the generation of comparable data between companies (Levy et al, 2010). Nevertheless, it remains a world reference for non-financial disclosure and has been ratified by some governments, which encourages GRI disclosure and the establishment of standards based on its model (Dingwerth & Eichinger, 2010).…”
Section: Sustainability Indicators and The Grimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, as Lozano & Huisingh (2011) assert, social reporting "is being increasingly recognized as an important driver and vehicle to engage with and to report on a company"s efforts towards becoming more sustainable" (p. 105) and the GRI guideline "tends to be the most frequently used set of guidelines for SR reporting" (p. 100). Finally, Levy et al (2010) recognize that "GRI is most important as a tool for managing corporate sustainability efforts, assessing and protecting corporate reputation, and enhancing brand values" (p. 20). The GRI has released several versions of its sustainability reporting guidelines: the first in 2000, the second in 2002, the third in 2006, the fourth in 2001, and the last in 2013.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%