The Content and Quality of Information About Hyperacusis Presented Online

Smith, Stephen L.; Smallwood, Ethan; Sereda, Magdalena; Adams, Bethany; Hoare, Derek J.

doi:10.1044/2020_aja-19-00074

Cited by 6 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Patients diagnosed with hyperacusis scored significantly more highly on the HIQ than those not so diagnosed. This suggests that the HIQ adequately measures the negative effect of hyperacusis on the patient's daily life, consistent with the notion that hyperacusis is associated with a high level of psychological distress and disability (40,41).…”

Section: Hiqsupporting

confidence: 75%

Confirmatory factor analysis of the Hyperacusis Impact Questionnaire, Sound Sensitivity Symptoms Questionnaire, and Screening for Anxiety and Depression in Tinnitus, including preliminary analyses of the parent versions for use with children

Aazh,

Hayes,

Erfanian

et al. 2024

J Am Acad Audiol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: We previously reported the results of exploratory factor analysis (EFA) of the Hyperacusis Impact Questionnaire (HIQ), the Sound Sensitivity Symptoms Questionnaire (SSSD) and the Screening for Anxiety and Depression in Tinnitus (SAD-T). Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) is necessary to confirm the latent constructs determined using EFA. CFA should use different samples but with similar characteristics to those used for EFA. Purpose: The aim was to use CFA to confirm latent constructs derived using EFA of the HIQ, SSSQ and SAD-T. We further evaluated the psychometric properties of parent versions of these questionnaires (indicated by -P), which are intended for use with children. Research Design: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study. Study Sample: Data for 323 consecutive adults and 49 children who attended a Tinnitus and Hyperacusis Therapy Clinic in the UK within a six-month period were included. Data Collection and Analysis: Data were collected retrospectively from the records of patients held at the audiology department. CFA with the weighted least-squares mean and variance-adjusted estimator was applied to assess the previously proposed factor structures of the HIQ, SSSQ and SAD-T. The internal consistency of the scales was assessed via Cronbach’s alpha (α). The items of the HIQ, SSSQ and SAD-T were tested for measurement invariance regarding age and gender using the multiple indicator multiple cause (MIMIC) model. Results: All questionnaires showed good to excellent internal consistency, with α = 0.93 for the HIQ, 0.87 for the SSSQ, and 0.91 for the SAD-T. The parent versions showed acceptable to good internal consistency, with α = 0.88 for the HIQ-P, 0.71 for the SSSQ-P, and 0.86 for the SAD-T-P. CFA showed that the HIQ, SSSQ, and SAD-T were all one-factor questionnaires and the factors generally were similar to those obtained for the EFA. The MIMIC model showed that all three questionnaires can be considered as measurement invariant, with scores similar across genders and ages. Conclusions: The HIQ, SSSQ and SAD-T are internally consistent one-factor questionnaires that can be used in clinical and research settings to assess the impact of hyperacusis, the severity of sound sensitivity symptoms, and to screen for anxiety and depression symptoms. Future studies should further explore the psychometric properties of the parent versions of the HIQ and SSSQ and SAD-T.

show abstract

Section: Hiqsupporting

confidence: 75%

Confirmatory factor analysis of the Hyperacusis Impact Questionnaire, Sound Sensitivity Symptoms Questionnaire, and Screening for Anxiety and Depression in Tinnitus, including preliminary analyses of the parent versions for use with children

Aazh,

Hayes,

Erfanian

et al. 2024

J Am Acad Audiol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Although there have been many advancements in tinnitus research including the development of the fear-avoidance model for tinnitus [ 55 , 56 ] and the availability of reliable information and support for patients with tinnitus [ 57 ], the same cannot be said for hyperacusis research and information. In a recent evaluation of information provided online for hyperacusis, Smith et al [ 58 ] found that there was wide disparity in the quality and content of hyperacusis information across websites, with little or poor quality information provided on causes, onset and treatments. Therefore, future research should focus on untangling the problems associated with tinnitus from those associated with hyperacusis and developing high quality and reliable informational resources that provide guidance on seeking care and support.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

What Should Be Considered When Assessing Hyperacusis? A Qualitative Analysis of Problems Reported by Hyperacusis Patients

et al. 2022

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Hyperacusis (decreased sound tolerance) is a prevalent complaint. Yet, to date, no research has qualitatively evaluated the types of problems experienced by adults with hyperacusis. Our service evaluation aims to determine the hyperacusis-related problem domains reported by patients and the degree to which these domains were reported together. Retrospective analysis was conducted on an anonymised clinical dataset from 306 patients who attended a UK tinnitus and hyperacusis treatment centre between 1994 and 2017. Conventional content analysis was used to categorise responses to the question ‘Why is hyperacusis a problem?’ into domains which were then subjected to a cluster analysis. Twenty-five problem domains were identified, of which 12 were further classified into three overarching categories. ‘Fear’, ‘Reduced quality of life’ and ‘Physical reaction to sound’ were most frequently reported problems. Cluster analysis revealed that ‘Sleep difficulties’ and ‘Despondency’, were commonly reported together. Adults with hyperacusis face many challenges in their everyday lives. The nature of these problems indicates the need to develop complex interventions and assessments to aid management of hyperacusis. Current hyperacusis questionnaires may be useful in identifying some problem domains, but further assessment thorough patient interviews is required to fully explore all potential problems and make informed decisions about treatment.

show abstract

“…A growing interest in understanding the internet and social media use regarding audiovestibular-related aspects is evident in research. Smith et al (2020) explored the use of fifteen internet websites using the single search term hyperacusis but did not specifically focus on social media. Their study revealed a wide disparity in the quality and content of hyperacusis information across websites.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Social Media Use in Hearing Loss, Tinnitus, and Vestibular Disorders: A Systematic Review

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: People are increasingly using social media outlets for gathering health-related information. There has also been considerable interest from researchers and clinicians in understanding how social media is used by the general public, patients, and health professionals to gather health-related information. Interest in the use of social media for audiovestibular disorders has also received attention, although published evidence synthesis of this use is lacking. The objective of this review article was to synthesize existing research studies related to social media use concerning hearing loss, tinnitus, and vestibular disorders. Method: Comprehensive searches were performed in multiple databases between October and November 2020 and again in June 2021 and March 2022, with additional reports identified from article citations and unpublished literature. This review article was presented using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Results: A total of 1,512 articles were identified. Of these, 16 publications met the inclusion criteria. Overall, social media offered people the platform to learn about hearing loss, tinnitus, and vestibular disorders via advice and support seeking, personal experience sharing, general information sharing, and relationship building. Research studies were more common on information and user activities seen on Facebook Pages, Twitter, and YouTube videos. Misinformation was identified across all social media platforms for each of these conditions. Conclusions: Online discussions about audiovestibular disorders are evident, although inconsistencies in study procedures make it difficult to compare these discussion groups. Misinformation is a concern needing to be addressed during clinical consultations as well as via other public health means. Uniform guidelines are needed for research regarding the use of social media so that outcomes are comparable. Moreover, clinical studies examining how exposure to and engagement with social media information may impact outcomes (e.g., help seeking, rehabilitation uptake, rehabilitation use, and satisfaction) require exploration. Supplemental Material: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.20667672

show abstract

The Content and Quality of Information About Hyperacusis Presented Online

Cited by 6 publications

References 20 publications

Confirmatory factor analysis of the Hyperacusis Impact Questionnaire, Sound Sensitivity Symptoms Questionnaire, and Screening for Anxiety and Depression in Tinnitus, including preliminary analyses of the parent versions for use with children

Confirmatory factor analysis of the Hyperacusis Impact Questionnaire, Sound Sensitivity Symptoms Questionnaire, and Screening for Anxiety and Depression in Tinnitus, including preliminary analyses of the parent versions for use with children

What Should Be Considered When Assessing Hyperacusis? A Qualitative Analysis of Problems Reported by Hyperacusis Patients

Social Media Use in Hearing Loss, Tinnitus, and Vestibular Disorders: A Systematic Review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About