Metaphor and Thought 1993
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9781139173865.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The contemporary theory of metaphor

Abstract: To Appear in Ortony, Andrew (ed.) Metaphor and Thought (2nd edition), Cambridge University Press. Do not go gentle into that good night.-Dylan Thomas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

30
1,673
2
280

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3,025 publications
(2,189 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(2 reference statements)
30
1,673
2
280
Order By: Relevance
“…This metonymic inference constitutes a mediator for a metaphorical reading (although she claims to be unsure of what she is saying): but I think ... that when you make an X-ray of a person, you have the lungs' tree, full of iron, forming an image of a tree, as if it were a landscape…She therefore constructs a metaphor from a metonymy, as Goossens (2002) would say, by using Asdrúbal's reading to mediate her metonymic and metaphoric inferences. In other words, she is building a metaphorical reading, by mapping the image of lung tree that is seen in the X-ray onto the image of the landscape, i.e., an image metaphor (Lakoff 1993) from a metonymy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This metonymic inference constitutes a mediator for a metaphorical reading (although she claims to be unsure of what she is saying): but I think ... that when you make an X-ray of a person, you have the lungs' tree, full of iron, forming an image of a tree, as if it were a landscape…She therefore constructs a metaphor from a metonymy, as Goossens (2002) would say, by using Asdrúbal's reading to mediate her metonymic and metaphoric inferences. In other words, she is building a metaphorical reading, by mapping the image of lung tree that is seen in the X-ray onto the image of the landscape, i.e., an image metaphor (Lakoff 1993) from a metonymy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For Lakoff (2006), metaphors are "primarily conceptual, conventional and part of the ordinary system of thought and language" (p. 186), organized by cross-domain mappings in which abstract notions are understood by way of concrete concepts founded in our embodied experience. This view strongly rejects the secular distinction between figurative and literal meaning, as well as the false assumptions such a differentiation entails.…”
Section: A Different Understanding Of Metaphormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted, however, that not all language is metaphorical: Lakoff (2006) lists examples of concepts that are not to be taken metaphorically. Such concepts refer to rather straightforward physical descriptions of events, when it is undoubtedly clear that the physicality is the focus, such as in the balloon went up.…”
Section: A Different Understanding Of Metaphormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the start, the new approach to metaphor -first formulated by Lakoff and Johnson in 1980 and subsequently developed as Conceptual Metaphor Theory or CMT (Lakoff 1987(Lakoff , 1993) -was presented not only as an empirical breakthrough in the domain of metaphor research, but also as a revolutionary account of meaning, potentially transforming numerous disciplines. The latter claim was substantiated in several book…”
Section: Cmt and The 'Work' Of Metaphor | 154mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I will focus on the cognitive importance of metaphor, as this aspect plays a central role in Lakoff's account. If my approach is adversarial at places, I submit that it is motivated not only by an intention to dispel the rhetoric surrounding CMT but also to give due recognition to Lakoff and his collaborators' legitimate achievements.From the start, the new approach to metaphor -first formulated by Lakoff and Johnson in 1980 and subsequently developed as Conceptual Metaphor Theory or CMT (Lakoff 1987(Lakoff , 1993) -was presented not only as an empirical breakthrough in the domain of metaphor research, but also as a revolutionary account of meaning, potentially transforming numerous disciplines. The latter claim was substantiated in several book…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%