“…In 1999, The Adelaide Declaration on National Goals for Schooling in the Twenty-First Century (MYCEETA, 1999) enabled the federal government to exercise greater influence by making funding contingent on "recipient jurisdiction implementation of requirements" (Bezzina, et al, 2009, p. 547;Brennan 2011). Despite these measured steps toward a national curriculum, educators expressed concern about its impact on their traditional autonomy in the classroom (Batra, 2006;Brennan, 2011); the potential for coercive and corporate compliance with national curriculum policies that have not been informed by or consulted with practitioners (Lingard, et al, 1995); what constitutes 'official' knowledge and whose knowledge matters (Riddle & Apple, 2019;Brennan, et al, 2021), and the potential for inconsistent implementation exacerbated by a lack of professional development (Barton, et al, 2013;Kennedy, et al, 1995;Lingard et al, 1995;Mueller, 2021). Nevertheless, some studies have also shown that as teachers became more familiar with the requirements of a national curriculum, and confident in their "pedagogical artistry" and renewed agency, they adopt a more positive approach (Helsby, 2005;Henderson & Slattery, 2008, p. 1).…”