1996
DOI: 10.1037/0003-066x.51.10.1083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Consumer Reports study of psychotherapy: Invalid is invalid.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Self-reported measures are inherently biased because participants who have invested a lot of time and energy in a treatment program, such as MBSR, are less likely to give negative evaluations [ 102 ]. Therefore, behavioral reports by relevant others may be a useful addition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Self-reported measures are inherently biased because participants who have invested a lot of time and energy in a treatment program, such as MBSR, are less likely to give negative evaluations [ 102 ]. Therefore, behavioral reports by relevant others may be a useful addition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants who dropped out might have given lower ratings. Kazdin (1994) notes that client satisfaction measures may not correlate with measures of dysfunction, and Brock, Green, Reich, and Evans (1996) suggest that participants who have invested substantial time and effort in a treatment program may be unwilling to evaluate it negatively. However, Kazdin (1994) also notes that client satisfaction is an important consideration when one is choosing among treatment alternatives, and these results suggest that many clients find mindfulness interventions beneficial.…”
Section: Empirical Research On Mindfulness‐based Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He stated that if his tripartite model is to be taken seriously, then self-reports reflect one of the perspectives and must be taken seriously, especially if robust improvement is reported, as was the case in the Consumer Reports study and in the study reported on here. Brock, Green, Reich, and Evans (1996) and Brock, Green, and Reich (1998) criticized the Consumer Reports study on the basis of its use ofself-report data. They saw less validity in all self-reports because there was no random assignment of clients in the Consumer Reports study and also because they believe self-reports are distorted by the desire of clients to validate their therapy.…”
Section: Self-reportsmentioning
confidence: 99%