2005
DOI: 10.1177/153944920502500104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Construction of Keyforms for Obtaining Instantaneous Measures from the Occupational Performance History Interview Rating Scales

Abstract: Occupational therapists routinely use rating scales to indicate a client's level of functioning, monitor progress, and evaluate intervention success. Rating scales yield ordinal data, whereas true measurement requires interval level data. Rasch analysis can convert rating scale data into true interval measures, but the use of measures derived from this method is limited in everyday occupational therapy practice because raw data must be computer scored. The keyform is an alternative to computer scoring. It is a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A possible solution to the problem of assessments that do little to inform clinical practice involves redesigning assessments using item response theory (IRT) methodologies. Rasch analysis, the one-parameter IRT model, can provide a clear picture of which items on an assessment will provide the right challenge for the patient (Kielhofner, Dobria, Forsyth, & Basu, 2005). That is, instantaneous evaluation of what the patient can and cannot do is made possible by placing his or her ability measure and item difficulty estimates on the same continuum (Linacre, 1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A possible solution to the problem of assessments that do little to inform clinical practice involves redesigning assessments using item response theory (IRT) methodologies. Rasch analysis, the one-parameter IRT model, can provide a clear picture of which items on an assessment will provide the right challenge for the patient (Kielhofner, Dobria, Forsyth, & Basu, 2005). That is, instantaneous evaluation of what the patient can and cannot do is made possible by placing his or her ability measure and item difficulty estimates on the same continuum (Linacre, 1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the items contributing to the construct being measured can be seen as making up a ruler with each item's difficulty estimate (logit measure) falling at a specific marking. Person ability estimates (also calculated in logits on the basis of the patient's responses to the items) can be placed on the same continuum, allowing for the direct comparison of patient ability with item difficulty (Kielhofner et al, 2005). These patient ability estimates indicate that someone possesses more or less of this construct.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given available technology, the data may be gathered using self-scoring forms that could provide actionable information to nutrition counselors at the point of use. Such forms have been widely used in health care and education [32][33][34].…”
Section: Analysis Of Item Measures -The First Two Research Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20,21 The FMA-UE keyform is shown in Figure 1. It consists of 3 regions established with Rasch analysis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%