2013
DOI: 10.1080/13613324.2013.843520
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The construction of ‘illiterate’ and ‘literate’ youth: the effects of high-stakes standardized literacy testing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While educators expect that the language development of elementary-level youth will take time, and thus that test scores may not show growth, impatience may set in when secondary-level ELs' test results do not show ''adequate'' progress-especially since scholarship shows that by late elementary (and middle/high school) youth have comparable or higher Dual Language as White Property achievement (Bearse et al, 2018). Educators should remember biliteracy is the goal, not solely English acquisition, and that standardized exams of academic content and language ability are designed to find deficits in racialized Others (Abella et al, 2005;Kearns, 2016). Thus, practitioners (and researchers) should not judge whether secondary ELs are benefiting from biliterate schooling based on their test gains.…”
Section: Conclusion and Implications For Justicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…While educators expect that the language development of elementary-level youth will take time, and thus that test scores may not show growth, impatience may set in when secondary-level ELs' test results do not show ''adequate'' progress-especially since scholarship shows that by late elementary (and middle/high school) youth have comparable or higher Dual Language as White Property achievement (Bearse et al, 2018). Educators should remember biliteracy is the goal, not solely English acquisition, and that standardized exams of academic content and language ability are designed to find deficits in racialized Others (Abella et al, 2005;Kearns, 2016). Thus, practitioners (and researchers) should not judge whether secondary ELs are benefiting from biliterate schooling based on their test gains.…”
Section: Conclusion and Implications For Justicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The focus on classifying and labeling students based on their annual achievement test results has widened the gap in achievement. As Kearns argued, "Good students are shown to be literate successful standardized test takers; whereas those who fail are deficient, illiterate, flawed, and in need of remedy, remediation, and transformation" [52]. Using standard terms, such as proficient, partially proficient, and unsatisfactory, as a means of categorizing students has unduly influenced teachers' curriculum and assessment design [53].…”
Section: Self-esteem Needsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, standardized testing has been criticized for the degree to which they can assess the intellect and cognitive processes of students from diverse backgrounds (Rhodes et al, 2005). Indeed, Kearns (2016) argues that standardized testing is biased and builds upon masculine domination and colonialism when ranking students and results in the artificial construction of deficient youth identities. Furthermore, the belief held by standardized assessments that all children reach a given level of cognitive development at the same age across cultures is not universally true (Cole, 2006).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%