“…Other research on Indo‐Caribbeans in the U.S. and Canada explore factors that influence their acculturation and adaptation patterns (Clément, Singh, & Gaudet, ; Sills & Chowthi, ), how they seek cultural and political recognition (Premdas, ), their self‐representations in media (Tanikella, ), how physical appearance and closeness to the dominant group influence identity development (Plaza, ), and transnational connections between Indo‐Caribbean diasporas in Canada and the U.S. (Trotz, ). Across the literature, a key tension that is addressed by researchers is how Indo‐Caribbeans navigate identifying with dominant racial categories, falling outside of hegemonic conceptions of both what is considered “Indian” and “Caribbean.” Returning to our definitions of hybridity as a refusal of racial purisms and essentialized notions of identity and culture, Indo‐Caribbean identity has been understood in the literature as a traveling identity, multi‐rooted, and at times, contradictory.…”