2015
DOI: 10.1080/10361146.2015.1034237
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The construction of a ‘narrative’ in Australian federal budget speeches, 1996–2013

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
9
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It is not a concern because the article only analyzes the language of the speeches. Although a speech writer may prepare and can influence the speeches, their content reflects the government's perspective (Lukin, 2015;Thompson, 2015). The actual writer is perhaps unimportant because these speeches are considered an authentic and authoritative portrayal of the economy (Rajandran, 2013).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…It is not a concern because the article only analyzes the language of the speeches. Although a speech writer may prepare and can influence the speeches, their content reflects the government's perspective (Lukin, 2015;Thompson, 2015). The actual writer is perhaps unimportant because these speeches are considered an authentic and authoritative portrayal of the economy (Rajandran, 2013).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the 1999 budget speech is tabled in 1998. The speech is considered a genre because there is general consensus about its purposes, structures and conventions (Lukin, 2015;Thompson, 2015). From 1999 to 2018, the Minister of Finance, who was often the Prime Minister, tabled the speech.…”
Section: Budget Speechesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations