1995
DOI: 10.1142/s0218271895000417
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Constraint Algebra of Quantum Gravity in the Loop Representation

Abstract: We study the algebra of constraints of quantum gravity in the loop representation based on Ashtekar's new variables. We show by direct computation that the quantum commutator algebra reproduces the classical Poisson bracket one, in the limit in which regulators are removed. The calculation illustrates the use of several computational techniques for the loop representation.CGPG-94/4-3 gr-qc/9404059

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Having a well defined action for the loop derivative opens the possibility of introducing quantum versions of the Hamiltonian constraint and to implement in a concrete well defined setting proposals for the Hamiltonian constraint that have been shown to have the correct algebra at a formal quantum level [6]. We will expand on this and other topics in the companion paper.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Having a well defined action for the loop derivative opens the possibility of introducing quantum versions of the Hamiltonian constraint and to implement in a concrete well defined setting proposals for the Hamiltonian constraint that have been shown to have the correct algebra at a formal quantum level [6]. We will expand on this and other topics in the companion paper.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This opens the hope that a consistent set of constraints, satisfying the appropriate commutator algebra, might be found. One could think of computing the commutator algebra off-shell, very much along the same lines as in the formal computations of [6], except that now the operators involved are also well defined on-shell (i.e. when the wavefunctions are knot invariants) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where Θ ✸ (y) is one if y ∈ ✸ and zero otherwise. We now replace in (7) the ǫ abc using formula (8) and we represent u c k A c (v ✸ ) using a holonomy in the fundamental representation along the edge u k of the triangulation,…”
Section: The Hamiltonian Constraintmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where we have identified v ≡ v ✸ to simplify the notation. Using (8) we replace the ǫ acd and ǫ def in terms of the volume of the elementary regions and the edges u of the tetrahedra, and we join four of the u's with the A's to construct holonomies along the edges of the triangulation,…”
Section: A Functions Of Spin Nets With "Marked Vertices"mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation