The Constitutionality of the 2003 Revisions to Canon 3(E) of the Model Code of Judicial Conduct

A large majority of state judges are chosen through some form of popular election. In Republican Party of Minnesota v. White, the Supreme Court struck down a law forbidding certain judicial campaign speech. A decade later, the Court in United States v. Alvarez ruled that factually false statements do not constitute categorically unprotected expression under the First Amendment. Together, these two holdings, along with the Court's wider protection of political expression and disapproval of content-based restrictions, cast serious doubt on states' ability to ban false and misleading speech by judicial candidates. Commonly known as the misrepresent clause, this prohibition has intuitive appeal in light of judges' responsibilities and still exists in many states. Given the provision's vulnerability to challenge, however, states may be able to avert chronic fabrication by judicial candidates only by removing its ultimate source-judicial elections themselves. "If the State chooses to tap the energy and the legitimizing power of the democratic process, it must accord the participants in that process. .. the First Amendment rights that attach to their roles." 1 "[A] State's decision to elect its judiciary does not compel it to treat judicial candidates like campaigners for political office." 2 WASH. POST (Sept. 22

show abstract

The Looming Collapse of Restrictions on Judicial Campaign Speech

Stern

2007

SSRN Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

hi@scite.ai

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

The Constitutionality of the 2003 Revisions to Canon 3(E) of the Model Code of Judicial Conduct

Cited by 3 publications

References 0 publications

New Media and the Courts: The Current Status and a Look at the Future

New Media and the Courts: The Current Status and a Look at the Future

Judicial Candidates' Right to Lie

The Looming Collapse of Restrictions on Judicial Campaign Speech

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About