1940
DOI: 10.1016/s0096-6347(40)90352-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The constitutional factor in skull form and dental occlusion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

1949
1949
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Johnson, köpeklerde kafatas›n›n formunu ve dental okluzyonu de¤erlendirdi¤i çal›flma-s›nda, fasial büyüme üzerinde genetik faktör-lerin çevresel faktörleri etkiledi¤i sonucuna varm›flt›r (24) (26).…”
Section: De Er Rl Le Em Me E / / D De Er Rl Le Em Me E / / R Re Ev unclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Johnson, köpeklerde kafatas›n›n formunu ve dental okluzyonu de¤erlendirdi¤i çal›flma-s›nda, fasial büyüme üzerinde genetik faktör-lerin çevresel faktörleri etkiledi¤i sonucuna varm›flt›r (24) (26).…”
Section: De Er Rl Le Em Me E / / D De Er Rl Le Em Me E / / R Re Ev unclassified
“…Johnson, in a study of skull form and dental occlusion in dogs, concluded that genetic influences condition the environmental effects on facial growth (24). Snodgrasse concluded that from his family-line study that familial records enable the orthodontist to anticipate difficulty in treatment and the prognosis for success (25).…”
Section: De Er Rl Le Em Me E / / D De Er Rl Le Em Me E / / R Re Ev mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On sounder ground are the conclusions reached by Johnson (1949), based on C. R. Stockard's studies with dogs: (1) in size and form the cranium and the face are independent, (2) there is a lack of correlation between the upper face and the mandible, and (3) the size of the dental arch shows a far greater fluctuation than does the size of the teeth. In a sense, Korkhaus (1957) challenges the first conclusion.…”
Section: Faciodental Growth a D Occlusionmentioning
confidence: 99%