Comparative Constitutional Reasoning 2017
DOI: 10.1017/9781316084281.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Constitutional Court of South Africa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Policy proposals are often not available on popular media, but on departmental websites or in the Government Gazette, which is a technical publication that requires internet access. Another possible factor is that organs of state are not obliged to conduct communications in more than one language, despite South Africa recognizing 11 official languages and mandating the use of at least three for certain governmental activities ( Rautenbach, 2018 ). The initial policy proposal by the Treasury was published in English and used technical language.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Policy proposals are often not available on popular media, but on departmental websites or in the Government Gazette, which is a technical publication that requires internet access. Another possible factor is that organs of state are not obliged to conduct communications in more than one language, despite South Africa recognizing 11 official languages and mandating the use of at least three for certain governmental activities ( Rautenbach, 2018 ). The initial policy proposal by the Treasury was published in English and used technical language.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of section 34, the state has an obligation to provide working courts for the adjudication of disputes. 62 The section dictates that "[e]veryone has the right to have any dispute that can be resolved by the application of law decided in a fair public hearing before a court or, where appropriate, another independent and 62 Rautenbach and Venter Rautenbach-Malherbe Constitutional Law (2018) 450. The authors instruct that s 34 encompasses a right of equality in civil proceedings, a right of information concerning the opposition's case and the hearing, a right to be heard and to adduce evidence; a right of persons who are not parties to the proceedings not to be affected by adverse orders and a right for reasons for a court's decision; in support they rely impartial tribunal or forum".…”
Section: Access For All: the Courts As A Public Resourcementioning
confidence: 99%